Literature DB >> 14753622

Influence of geoengineered climate on the terrestrial biosphere.

Vaishali Naik1, Donald J Wuebbles, Evan H Delucia, Jonathan A Foley.   

Abstract

Various geoengineering schemes have been proposed to counteract anthropogenically induced climate change. In a previous study, it was suggested that a 1.8% reduction in solar radiation incident on the Earth's surface could noticeably reduce regional and seasonal climate change from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). However, the response of the terrestrial biosphere to reduced solar radiation in a CO2-rich climate was not investigated. In this study, we hypothesized that a reduction in incident solar radiation in a Doubled CO2 atmosphere will diminish the net primary productivity (NPP) of terrestrial ecosystems, potentially accelerating the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere. We used a dynamic global ecosystem model, the Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS), to investigate this hypothesis in an unperturbed climatology. While this simplified modeling framework effectively separated the influence of CO2 and sunlight on the terrestrial biosphere, it did not consider the complex feedbacks within the Earth's climate system. Our analysis indicated that compared to a Doubled CO2 scenario, reduction in incident solar radiation by 1.8% in a double CO2 world will have negligible impact on the NPP of terrestrial ecosystems. There were, however, spatial variations in the response of NPP-engineered solar radiation. While productivity decreased by less than 2% in the tropical and boreal forests as hypothesized, it increased by a similar percentage in the temperate deciduous forests and grasslands. This increase in productivity was attributed to an approximately 1% reduction in evapotranspiration in the Geoengineered scenario relative to the Doubled CO2 scenario. Our initial hypothesis was rejected because of unanticipated effects of engineered solar radiation on the hydrologic cycle. However, any geoengineering approaches that reduce incident solar radiation need to be thoroughly analyzed in view of the implications on ecosystem productivity and the hydrologic cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14753622     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2993-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Climatic control of the high-latitude vegetation greening trend and Pinatubo effect.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lucht; I Colin Prentice; Ranga B Myneni; Stephen Sitch; Pierre Friedlingstein; Wolfgang Cramer; Philippe Bousquet; Wolfgang Buermann; Benjamin Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Forests, carbon and global climate.

Authors:  Yadvinder Malhi; Patrick Meir; Sandra Brown
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Influence of Land-Surface Evapotranspiration on the Earth's Climate.

Authors:  J Shukla; Y Mintz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology.

Authors:  Peter S Curtis; Xianzhong Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Forest carbon balance under elevated CO2.

Authors:  Jason G Hamilton; Evan H DeLucia; Kate George; Shawna L Naidu; Adrien C Finzi; William H Schlesinger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario.

Authors:  David P Keller; Ellias Y Feng; Andreas Oschlies
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.