BACKGROUND: Intrapancreatic accessory spleens are frequently confused with primary pancreatic tumors, and differentiation from neoplastic lesions is important to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy. We present three cases of intrapancreatic accessory spleen evaluated by computed tomographic arteriography (CTA) and discuss the characteristic findings. METHODS: CTA was performed, followed by digital subtraction angiography, with an injection of contrast material through a 4-F catheter placed in the celiac artery. Single-level dynamic CTA was also performed in two patients with a 30-s continuous scan in one breath-hold. RESULTS: CTA clearly demonstrated early inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion, similar to the splenic parenchyma. On single-level dynamic CTA, inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion in the early phase was diminished in the late phase. Multiplanar reformatted images obtained in two cases showed the deep cleft between the lesion and the pancreas, which suggested that the lesion was originally extrapancreatic. CONCLUSIONS: These two findings on CTA, inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion and the deep cleft between the lesion and the pancreas, may help to confirm the diagnosis of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen.
BACKGROUND: Intrapancreatic accessory spleens are frequently confused with primary pancreatic tumors, and differentiation from neoplastic lesions is important to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy. We present three cases of intrapancreatic accessory spleen evaluated by computed tomographic arteriography (CTA) and discuss the characteristic findings. METHODS: CTA was performed, followed by digital subtraction angiography, with an injection of contrast material through a 4-F catheter placed in the celiac artery. Single-level dynamic CTA was also performed in two patients with a 30-s continuous scan in one breath-hold. RESULTS: CTA clearly demonstrated early inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion, similar to the splenic parenchyma. On single-level dynamic CTA, inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion in the early phase was diminished in the late phase. Multiplanar reformatted images obtained in two cases showed the deep cleft between the lesion and the pancreas, which suggested that the lesion was originally extrapancreatic. CONCLUSIONS: These two findings on CTA, inhomogeneous enhancement of the lesion and the deep cleft between the lesion and the pancreas, may help to confirm the diagnosis of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen.