Literature DB >> 14753389

Smallpox vaccine: problems and prospects.

Gregory A Poland1, John M Neff.   

Abstract

Smallpox justifiably is feared because of its morbidity and mortality. Wide-spread population-level susceptibility to smallpox exists, and the only effective tool against the virus is a live, attenuated vaccine that is highly reactogenic and controversial. A significant minority of the population has contraindications that prevent preexposure use of this vaccine. Newer, safer, and equally immunogenic vaccines must be developed and licensed. Several live, attenuated vaccines are in clinical trials. Although these vaccines may prove to be less reactogenic, they still may not be administered safely to a significant portion of the population because they contain live, attenuated viruses. Newer vaccines will be needed if routine preexposure vaccination is to be instituted universally. The idea of a subunit or peptide-based vaccine is appealing, because it obviates potential safety concerns. It may be possible to use a more-attenuated, live vaccine strain for a large segment of the population on a preexposure basis and accept the morbidity and mortality that would result from its use on a postexposure basis, if necessary. The need for widespread population-level protection against variola infection is apparent. The use of the new biology tools to predict or define who might experience serious reactions to the smallpox vaccine and why these reactions occur is an area ripe for additional research. The reason why an individual develops postvaccinal encephalitis remains unknown, and the development is unpredictable and untreatable. In the future, if the mechanism behind such adverse events is defined, it may be possible to screen persons who are likely to experience such events. Although the authors remain proponents for use of the vaccine in alignment with the CDC vaccination program and recommendations, the previous concerns indicate that new knowledge must be gained and shared. Further research on attenuated vaccines and nonliving or peptide vaccines with equal efficacy should remain the goal, as it is apparent that smallpox vaccine once again will become part of the vaccinologist's and public health official's armamentarium in the decades to come.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14753389     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8561(03)00096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8561            Impact factor:   3.479


  7 in total

Review 1.  Adversomics: a new paradigm for vaccine safety and design.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitaker; Inna G Ovsyannikova; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Primary Human B Cells at Different Differentiation and Maturation Stages Exhibit Distinct Susceptibilities to Vaccinia Virus Binding and Infection.

Authors:  Nicole Shepherd; Jie Lan; Wei Li; Sushmita Rane; Qigui Yu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Statistical approach to estimate vaccinia-specific neutralizing antibody titers using a high-throughput assay.

Authors:  Richard Kennedy; V Shane Pankratz; Eric Swanson; David Watson; Hana Golding; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-06-17

4.  Coadministration of cidofovir and smallpox vaccine reduced vaccination side effects but interfered with vaccine-elicited immune responses and immunity to monkeypox.

Authors:  Huiyong Wei; Dan Huang; Jeff Fortman; Richard Wang; Linyun Shao; Zheng W Chen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  A 33-year-old man with a facial rash.

Authors:  John Fleming; William A Lynn
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 6.  Rethinking smallpox.

Authors:  Martin M Weiss; Peter D Weiss; Glenn Mathisen; Phyllis Guze
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  ACAM2000: a newly licensed cell culture-based live vaccinia smallpox vaccine.

Authors:  Richard N Greenberg; Jeffrey S Kennedy
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.498

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.