Literature DB >> 14753248

Efficacy and safety of inhaled budesonide delivered once or twice daily via HFA-134a in mild to moderate persistent asthma in adult patients. Comparison with budesonide CFC.

E Vastagh1, P Kuna, P Calistruc, M A Bogdan.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to investigate whether budesonide 4001 microg twice daily (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.) given with the HFA-134a propellant is equivalent in efficacy and safety to the same dose regimen delivered with the marketed CFC product in adult asthmatics with mild to moderate persistent asthma; the effects of budesonide HFA 800 microg once daily were also studied. After a 2-week run-in, a total number of 98, 103 and 97 patients were assigned to the 12-week treatment with budesonide given with HFA or CFC twice daily (morning and evening), or HFA once daily (morning), respectively. The main outcome variable morning PEFR, as well as evening PEFR and clinical symptoms (day-time and night-time asthma attacks, number of asthma-induced night-time awakenings and overall symptoms' scores) were measured daily by patients. Other standard pulmonary function testing were measured at clinic visits. A blood sample for morning serum dosing (8.00-10.00 AM) was taken at baseline and at endpoint. Adverse events and vital signs were also recorded. Significant improvements at endpoint in morning and evening PEFR, as well as in clinic PEFR and MEF50, were observed in both the twice daily groups only. An exact proof of equivalence between HFA and CFC given twice daily was demonstrated for the primary parameters, morning PEFR (equivalence pre-defined limits were +/- 40.27 l/min, difference between means = 4.0 l/min and 95% CI -6.9-14.9) and secondary parameters as evening PEFR: (limits +/- 40.19 l/min, difference between means = 2.1 l/min and 95% Confidence interval (CI) -9.4-13.5) and FEV1 (limits +/- 0.27 l, difference between means = 0.0 l and 95% CI -0.11-0.10). Less evident (but within limits) proofs of equivalence were shown in the comparisons with the once daily group. No substantial differences between the three groups were observed for the other efficacy variables, including symptoms and use of rescue salbutamol, which significantly improved over the run-in values in all groups. Minimal and non-significant decreases over pre-treatment values were observed in the three groups for morning serum cortisol levels: the analysis of individual data has shown a better outcome in the HFA twice daily regimen, compared with the other two groups. Again, a similar amount of patients in both the twice daily groups reported drug-related adverse events, which were more frequent in the once daily HFA group. Therefore, the results of this study have shown that inhaled budesonide given with new HFA-134a propellant can replace microgram-equivalent doses of the corresponding marketed CFC product when given twice daily. An overall maintainment and an unchanged risk-benefit ratio has emerged for budesonide HFA given once daily, which was however slightly inferior compared with the standard twice daily regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14753248     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  3 in total

Review 1.  Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.

Authors:  Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Francine M Ducharme
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

Review 2.  Addition of long-acting beta2-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids versus same dose inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma in adults and children.

Authors:  Francine M Ducharme; Muireann Ni Chroinin; Ilana Greenstone; Toby J Lasserson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

3.  Beclomethasone/formoterol fixed combination for the management of asthma: patient considerations.

Authors:  Gabriele Nicolini; Nicola Scichilone; Andrea Bizzi; Alberto Papi; Leonardo M Fabbri
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.