Literature DB >> 14752656

Dual endoscopic-assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal: a feasibility study.

B P Jacob1, M Gagner, T I Hung, S Fukuyama, A Waage, L Biertho, W W Kim, N Sekhar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergent colostomies are associated with increased morbidity related to second closure operations. The purpose of this canine pilot study was to create a minimally invasive procedure that would reduce the time interval and morbidity involved with colostomy reversals after left colon end colostomies.
METHODS: Six mongrel dogs underwent modified laparoscopic Hartmann's procedures in which the stapled end of the rectal stump was approximated to the left colon proximal to the stoma. After 1 week, they underwent an endoluminal colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device and varying anvil insertion methods. Variables recorded included anvil insertion technique and feasibility, OR time, complications, and number of days to first meal and bowel movement. A contrast enema performed 1 week post colostomy reversal ruled out anastomosis leaks and stenosis. The dogs were euthanized and subjected to necropsy.
RESULTS: Of four anvil insertion techniques tested, the most feasible employed a large-bore needle to perforate through the stapled end of the Hartmann pouch into the lumen of the left colon. Simultaneous endoluminal views of the rectal stump with a sigmoidoscope and the left colon lumen with an endoscope permitted a controlled and safe needle puncture. Through the needle, a guide wire was inserted to withdraw the anvil via the colostomy into place. A transanally inserted stapler was then married to the anvil under fluoroscopic guidance, thus completing the anastomosis. The colostomy was then taken down and transected at the level of the colocolostomy. Average operating time was 126 min (range 90-180), diet was tolerated within 1.5 days, and average number of days to first bowel movement was 2.5. The absence of stenosis, leaks, and inadvertent visceral injuries confirmed feasibility.
CONCLUSIONS: In this canine model, a dual endoscopic-assisted colostomy reversal with a computer-mediated, circular stapling device is feasible. Using this technique, colostomy reversals can possibly be performed 1 week post-colostomy without entering the peritoneal cavity, thus reducing the number of invasive operations and subsequent morbidity required to manage emergent colon perforations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752656     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8914-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  The high morbidity of colostomy closure after trauma: further support for the primary repair of colon injuries.

Authors:  J D Berne; G C Velmahos; L S Chan; J A Asensio; D Demetriades
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of anorectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomoses.

Authors:  J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  M M Ravitch; F M Steichen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler.

Authors:  R J Detry; P J Kestens
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Technique for reestablishing continuity after the Hartmann operation.

Authors:  F J Criado; T H Wilson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Colostomy closure using local anesthesia.

Authors:  H Cantele; A Méndez; J Leyba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Colostomy closure: impact of preoperative risk factors on morbidity.

Authors:  S G Ghorra; T P Rzeczycki; R Natarajan; V E Pricolo
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Pittman; L E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Risk factors in colostomy closure.

Authors:  J Varnell; L B Pemberton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Colostomy closure. Ochsner Clinic experience.

Authors:  D A Khoury; D E Beck; F G Opelka; T C Hicks; A E Timmcke; J B Gathright
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dual endoscopically assisted endoluminal colostomy reversal.

Authors:  J Lenzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall; Werner A Draaisma; Esther S Schouten; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.407

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.