Literature DB >> 14752594

Mini-incisional Burch urethropexy: a less invasive method to accomplish a time-tested procedure for treatment of genuine stress incontinence.

Lawrence R Lind1, Gordon C Gunn, T Flemming Mattox, Edward J Stanford.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of performing the Burch urethropexy (BU) and the abdominal paravaginal repair (APR) through a 1.5-2.5 in suprapubic incision. A prospective clinical study was undertaken by four urogynecologists. Seventy-three patients, each with a urodynamic and clinical diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence, underwent a BU procedure, with 33 of the 73 having concomitant APR through the same incision. The duration of surgery and any complications were recorded. Postoperative outcome tests included subjective incontinence questionnaire, cough stress testing, pad testing, measurement of residual volumes, and analgesia requirements. The BU procedure was accomplished in 72 of 73 patients, with 1 requiring conversion to a 5 in incision. The mean operative time was 64.6 +/-21.9 (SD) min. Intraoperatively, 1 patient was noted to have a suture in the bladder. All patient having only a BU (40) went home on the day of surgery or the first postoperative day, and all patients with BU and APR went home within 2 days. All but 1 patient met the criteria for catheter removal within 7 days, with 1 patient suffering obstructive voiding. At a mean follow-up of 9 months, cough stress test and questionnaire demonstrated complete cure in 70 of 72 patients tested. Pad testing confirmed cure in all of the 46 patients who consented to the test. We conclude that the standard Burch procedure and paravaginal repair can be accomplished safely and with excellent short-term efficacy through a 1.5-2.5 in incision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752594     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-003-1045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  8 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Laparoscopic bladderneck suspension.

Authors:  T G Vancaillie; W Schuessler
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-06

3.  Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up.

Authors:  M Alcalay; A Monga; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-09

4.  Effects of estrogen on urethral function in women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  N N Bhatia; A Bergman; M M Karram
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cooper's ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Nine years' experience--results, complications, technique.

Authors:  J C Burch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1968-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure).

Authors:  C Y Liu; W Paek
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1993-11

7.  A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  U Ulmsten; C Falconer; P Johnson; M Jomaa; L Lannér; C G Nilsson; I Olsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

8.  Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension using hernia mesh and surgical staples.

Authors:  C S Ou; J Presthus; E Beadle
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1993-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.