Literature DB >> 14752432

Is surgical intervention still indicated in recurrent aortic arch obstruction?

Joy Zoghbi1, Alain Serraf, Siamak Mohammadi, Emré Belli, François Lacour Gayet, B Aupecle, J Losay, J Petit, Claude Planché.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Introduction of balloon dilatation has become the standard treatment for recurrent aortic arch obstruction and has changed the therapeutic approach to patients with this disorder.
OBJECTIVES: Whether all patients with recurrent aortic arch obstruction are candidates for balloon dilatation remains unanswered. In addition, only few reports have tried to compare the results between patients undergoing balloon dilatation or redo operations.
METHODS: Since 1983, 97 patients underwent reintervention for recurrent aortic arch obstruction (42 dilations and 55 reoperations). Eight had immediate unsuccessful dilatation and were shifted to the surgical group (n = 63). The median age at reintervention was 21.7 months (10 days-45 years), and the median delay was 13.6 months (7 days-17 years). Anatomy of the aortic arch oriented the surgical approach to treat arch hypoplasia. It could be performed through a left thoracotomy in 52 patients, with extended end-to-end anastomosis in 34 patients, subclavian flap repair in 9 patients, conduit insertion in 6 patients, and patch enlargement in 3 patients. More recently, an anterior approach with cardiopulmonary bypass without circulatory arrest was applied to enlarge the patch in all the aortic arches.
RESULTS: There was one early death in the surgical intervention group and 2 late deaths in the dilation group. Major complications and recurrence were higher in the dilated group (4 vs 0, P <.01, and 14 vs 5, P <.0004, respectively). At a mean follow-up of 11.8 +/- 4.1 years in the surgical intervention group and 7.5 +/- 2.5 years in the dilated group, systemic hypertension was normalized in all but 5 patients in the surgical intervention group and 6 patients in the dilated group.
CONCLUSION: Reoperation for recurrent aortic arch obstruction can be performed safely, with low rates of mortality and morbidity. This approach should be considered versus balloon angioplasty, especially in patients older than 4 years and in the presence of aortic arch hypoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752432     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)01290-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for aortic arch disease in the neonate.

Authors:  Frank A Pigula
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  The Challenges of Redo Aortic Coarctation Repair in Adults.

Authors:  Jonathan D Price; Damien J LaPar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Coarctation repair-redo challenges in the adults: what to do?

Authors:  Erik Beckmann; Arminder S Jassar
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-04-23

4.  Endovascular management of coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  D R Turner; P A Gaines
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Aortic arch reconstruction in newborns with an autologous pericardial patch: contemporary results.

Authors:  Massimo Bernabei; Rafik Margaryan; Luigi Arcieri; Giacomo Bianchi; Vitali Pak; Bruno Murzi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-07

Review 6.  Management of adults with coarctation of aorta.

Authors:  Pradyumna Agasthi; Sai Harika Pujari; Andrew Tseng; Joseph N Graziano; Francois Marcotte; David Majdalany; Farouk Mookadam; Donald J Hagler; Reza Arsanjani
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.