Literature DB >> 14752289

Effects of prolactin level on burn-induced aberrations in myelopoiesis.

Amy L Dugan1, Sandy Schwemberger, George F Babcock, Donna Buckley, Arthur R Buckley, Cora K Ogle, Nelson D Horseman.   

Abstract

In this study, we sought to determine if prolactin (PRL) had any influence on burn-induced alterations in myelopoiesis and serum IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and MCP-1 levels. To do this, we used mice that were PRL normal, PRL deficient, or hyperprolactinemic and had received a 15% total body surface area burn, sham treatment, or no treatment. We performed clonogenic assays of bone marrow cells, and we found that sham treatment significantly decreased monocyte/macrophage (M) colony formation relative to the control group in the PRL-deficient and PRL-normal mice (P < 0.01). Hyperprolactinemia attenuated the sham-induced decrease in M colony formation. Burn injury significantly increased M colony formation relative to the sham group with an equal significance in the PRL-deficient and PRL-normal mice (P < 0.05). We also showed that burn led to a significant increase in GM colony formation relative to the sham group. This burn-induced increase was significant in the PRL-normal (P < 0.05) and the PRL-deficient (P < 0.01) mice. In the PRL-normal mice, burn injury caused a 2.1-fold increase in the GM colony number, whereas in the PRL-deficient mice burn led to a 2.6-fold increase in GM colony number. When comparing the effects of burn injury on colony formation to the control groups, there were no significant differences seen, irrespective of the PRL level. We observed that all of the cytokines studied, with the exception of IL-10, were influenced by either sham treatment, burn injury, or both forms of stress. This stress-induced response occurred most often in animals that were either hypo- or hyperprolactinemic. We conclude that the PRL level was able to influence the sham-induced and burn-induced alterations in GM and M colony formation. Under euprolactinemic conditions, mice exhibited less often with stress-induced serum cytokine level alterations. We did not find any significant correlations with any of the serum cytokine levels and the ability to form colonies. Importantly, the sham treatment led to immune alterations independent of, and sometimes opposite of burn-induced effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752289     DOI: 10.1097/01.shk.0000108401.56565.e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

1.  S179D prolactin diminishes the effects of UV light on epidermal gamma delta T cells.

Authors:  Esther A Guzmán; John L Langowski; Ariel De Guzman; H Konrad Muller; Ameae M Walker; Laurie B Owen
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.102

2.  A prolactin family paralog regulates reproductive adaptations to a physiological stressor.

Authors:  Rupasri Ain; Guoli Dai; Judy H Dunmore; Alan R Godwin; Michael J Soares
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Plasma prolactin in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Soroush; Hosein Mahmood Zadeh; Mehrnush Moemeni; Behnam Shakiba; Sara Elmi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  A Prolactin Family Paralog Regulates Placental Adaptations to a Physiological Stressor.

Authors:  Pengli Bu; Sheikh M Khorshed Alam; Pramod Dhakal; Jay L Vivian; Michael J Soares
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.