OBJECTIVE: To test the non-lipid-lowering effects of simvastatin on the response to injury in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Wild-type (WT) mice (n = 40) and hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein-E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) mice (n = 40) received normal chow or chow containing simvastatin 100 mg/kg/day prior to bilateral femoral artery wire injury. Intimal hyperplasia and plasma cholesterol concentration were quantified after 4 weeks. Plasma cholesterol in WT mice treated or untreated with simvastatin was similar (100.9 +/- 6.6 vs. 94.3 +/- 17.5 mg/dl). Simvastatin did not affect intimal hyperplasia. In apoE(-/-) mice, intimal hyperplasia was increased 2.3-fold relative to WT mice (17090 +/- 4998 vs. 39490 +/- 16190; p < 0.001). In apoE(-/- )mice, simvastatin caused a paradoxical increase in plasma cholesterol (1094 +/- 60.3 vs. 658 +/- 66.8 mg/dl; p < 0.001), confirmed by FPLC. This was associated with a further increase in intimal area (39490 +/- 16190 vs. 55420 +/- 22590 mm(2); p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: (1). Simvastatin had no effect on plasma cholesterol or the response to arterial injury in normolipidemic WT mice; (2). hyperlipidemia was associated with markedly increased intimal hyperplasia, and (3). simvastatin treatment of apoE(-/-) mice caused paradoxical hyperlipidemia and increased intimal hyperplasia. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
OBJECTIVE: To test the non-lipid-lowering effects of simvastatin on the response to injury in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Wild-type (WT) mice (n = 40) and hyperlipidemic apolipoprotein-E-deficient (apoE(-/-)) mice (n = 40) received normal chow or chow containing simvastatin 100 mg/kg/day prior to bilateral femoral artery wire injury. Intimal hyperplasia and plasma cholesterol concentration were quantified after 4 weeks. Plasma cholesterol in WT mice treated or untreated with simvastatin was similar (100.9 +/- 6.6 vs. 94.3 +/- 17.5 mg/dl). Simvastatin did not affect intimal hyperplasia. In apoE(-/-) mice, intimal hyperplasia was increased 2.3-fold relative to WT mice (17090 +/- 4998 vs. 39490 +/- 16190; p < 0.001). In apoE(-/- )mice, simvastatin caused a paradoxical increase in plasma cholesterol (1094 +/- 60.3 vs. 658 +/- 66.8 mg/dl; p < 0.001), confirmed by FPLC. This was associated with a further increase in intimal area (39490 +/- 16190 vs. 55420 +/- 22590 mm(2); p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: (1). Simvastatin had no effect on plasma cholesterol or the response to arterial injury in normolipidemic WT mice; (2). hyperlipidemia was associated with markedly increased intimal hyperplasia, and (3). simvastatin treatment of apoE(-/-) mice caused paradoxical hyperlipidemia and increased intimal hyperplasia. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: William M Southern; Anna S Nichenko; Daniel D Shill; Corey C Spencer; Nathan T Jenkins; Kevin K McCully; Jarrod A Call Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Birong Liao; Eileen McCall; Karen Cox; Chung-Wein Lee; Shuguang Huang; Richard E Higgs; Li-Chun Chio; Eugene Zhen; John E Hale; Nancy K Jackson; Pamela G Rutherford; Xiao-di Huang; Donetta Gifford-Moore; Kwan Hui; Kevin Duffin; Kenneth E Gould; Mark Rekhter Journal: Biomark Insights Date: 2008-03-12