Literature DB >> 14752039

The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems.

Andrew Livermore1, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

It is not possible to accurately predict the perceptual response to odorants and odorant mixtures without understanding patterns of suppression and facilitation that result from interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. The current study extends previous findings by exploring the effect of intensive training on the interaction between these systems and also by using a different mixed chemosensory stimulus to examine whether the principles established in earlier studies generalize to different odorants. Stimuli were chosen so as to selectively activate the olfactory (H2S) and trigeminal (CO2) nerves. In addition, linalool was included as a stimulus that activated both systems. Thirty-five participants (19 men, 16 women) rated the intensity of each stimulus when presented both alone and in binary mixtures (linalool + H2S, and linalool + CO2). Chemosensory event-related potentials were obtained from three recording positions. Analysis of intensity ratings showed that linalool was significantly less intense than the other stimuli when presented alone. In binary mixtures, H2S was strongly suppressed by linalool. One week of intensive odor training produced significant and specific reductions in the intensity of linalool and H2S, both alone and in their mixture. Training with a different odor (champignol) had no effect. Chemosensory event-related potential data confirmed previous findings showing changes in topographical distribution that reflected the degree of trigeminal activity. Binary mixtures generally produced larger amplitudes than single stimuli. Latencies clearly differentiated between the three single stimuli and the binary mixtures. Changes were observed in event-related potentials that reflected those obtained for intensity ratings in that they were observed for linalool and H2S in the linalool trained group only. The amplitude of the late 'endogenous' component (P3) was significantly decreased for these odors at frontal recording sites. In summary, strong and specific training effects were observed in intensity ratings for participants trained with the test odor (linalool), but not for those trained with a different odor. This was supported by a significant decrease of amplitudes of the event-related potentials at frontal recording sites following training with the test odor only

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14752039     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  11 in total

1.  [Treatment of olfactory disorders].

Authors:  T Hummel; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Correlation of tissue eosinophil count and chemosensory functions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Lichuan Zhang; Chunhua Hu; Zhifu Sun; Pengfei Han; Xingyu Han; Haili Sun; Dawei Wu; Qianwen Lv; Xiaoguang Yan; Wei Yu; Thomas Hummel; Yongxiang Wei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A time-saving method for recording chemosensory event-related potentials.

Authors:  Friederike Schaub; Michael Damm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Chemosensory function assessed with psychophysical testing and event-related potentials in patients with atrophic rhinitis.

Authors:  C Huart; Ph Eloy; S Collet; Ph Rombaux
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; T Hummel; J Berg; G Huang; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  S Craig Roberts; Jan Havlíček; Benoist Schaal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Null Effect of Olfactory Training With Patients Suffering From Depressive Disorders-An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Luise D Pabel; Julia Murr; Kerstin Weidner; Thomas Hummel; Ilona Croy
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance.

Authors:  Johannes Frasnelli; Johan N Lundström; Julie A Boyle; Jelena Djordjevic; Robert J Zatorre; Marilyn Jones-Gotman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Monitoring gaseous CO2 and ethanol above champagne glasses: flute versus coupe, and the role of temperature.

Authors:  Gérard Liger-Belair; Marielle Bourget; Hervé Pron; Guillaume Polidori; Clara Cilindre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Time-frequency analysis of chemosensory event-related potentials to characterize the cortical representation of odors in humans.

Authors:  Caroline Huart; Valéry Legrain; Thomas Hummel; Philippe Rombaux; André Mouraux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.