Rajeev K Azad1, Mark Borodovsky. 1. School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0230, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Markov chain models of DNA sequences have frequently been used in gene finding algorithms. Performance of the algorithm critically depends on the model structure and parameters. Still, the issue of choosing the model structure has not been studied with sufficient attention. RESULTS: We have assessed performance of several types of Markov chain models, both fixed order (FO) models and models with interpolation, within the framework of the GeneMark algorithm. The performance was measured in two ways: (i) the accuracy of detection of protein-coding potential in artificial DNA sequences and (ii) the accuracy of identifying genes in real prokaryotic genomes. We observed that the models built by deleted interpolation (DI) slightly outperformed other models in detecting protein-coding potential in artificial DNA sequences with GC content in the medium range and also in detecting genes in real genomes with medium GC content. For artificial and real genomic DNA with high or low GC content, we observed that the models built by DI were in some cases slightly outperformed by FO models.
MOTIVATION: Markov chain models of DNA sequences have frequently been used in gene finding algorithms. Performance of the algorithm critically depends on the model structure and parameters. Still, the issue of choosing the model structure has not been studied with sufficient attention. RESULTS: We have assessed performance of several types of Markov chain models, both fixed order (FO) models and models with interpolation, within the framework of the GeneMark algorithm. The performance was measured in two ways: (i) the accuracy of detection of protein-coding potential in artificial DNA sequences and (ii) the accuracy of identifying genes in real prokaryotic genomes. We observed that the models built by deleted interpolation (DI) slightly outperformed other models in detecting protein-coding potential in artificial DNA sequences with GC content in the medium range and also in detecting genes in real genomes with medium GC content. For artificial and real genomic DNA with high or low GC content, we observed that the models built by DI were in some cases slightly outperformed by FO models.