Literature DB >> 14751688

Studies to determine the critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point systems.

R A Pearce1, D J Bolton, J J Sheridan, D A McDowell, I S Blair, D Harrington.   

Abstract

Aerobic mesophilic counts (AMC), coliform (CC) and coliform resuscitation counts (CRCs) were obtained by swabbing 50 cm(2) areas at three sites (ham, belly and neck) on pig carcasses, after each of seven stages of the slaughter/dressing process (bleeding, scalding, dehairing, singeing, polishing, evisceration and chilling). In most cases, there were no statistical differences (P>0.05) among the counts derived by these three methods. Reductions in counts at individual sites were observed after scalding (3.5 log(10) cfu cm(-2)), and singeing (2.5 log(10) cfu cm(-2)). Increases in counts at individual sites were observed after dehairing (2.0 log(10) cfu cm(-2)) and polishing (1.5 log(10) cfu cm(-2)). The incidence of Salmonella on pig carcasses was also obtained by swabbing the outside surfaces of 100 half carcasses. Information on the incidence of Salmonella in scald tank water (108 samples) was also investigated. Carcass swabs and scald tank water were examined for the presence of Salmonella using standard enrichment methods. Salmonella were detected on 31% of carcasses immediately after bleeding, 7% of carcasses immediately after dehairing and evisceration, and 1% of carcasses immediately after scalding. Serovars included Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Hadar, Salmonella Infantis and Salmonella Derby. No Salmonella were recovered from samples of scald tank water. The impact of pig slaughter/dressing processes on carcass microbiology and their potential use as critical control points (CCPs) during pork production are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751688     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00333-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  10 in total

1.  Potential microbiological contamination of effluents in poultry and swine abattoirs.

Authors:  L S S Barros; L A Amaral; C S Lorenzon; J L Junior; J G Machado Neto
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Seasonal Prevalence of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli on Pork Carcasses for Three Steps of the Harvest Process at Two Commercial Processing Plants in the United States.

Authors:  Ivan Nastasijevic; John W Schmidt; Marija Boskovic; Milica Glisic; Norasak Kalchayanand; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Mohammad Koohmaraie; Joseph M Bosilevac
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Temporal and longitudinal analysis of Danish Swine Salmonellosis Control Programme data: implications for surveillance.

Authors:  J Benschop; M A Stevenson; J Dahl; R S Morris; N P French
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 4.  A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Slaughter and Processing Interventions to Control Non-Typhoidal Salmonella in Beef and Pork.

Authors:  Ian Young; Barbara J Wilhelm; Sarah Cahill; Rei Nakagawa; Patricia Desmarchelier; Andrijana Rajić
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Identification of the Source for Salmonella Contamination of Carcasses in a Large Pig Slaughterhouse.

Authors:  Hang Zeng; Geertrui Rasschaert; Lieven De Zutter; Wesley Mattheus; Koen De Reu
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-01-17

6.  Analysis of Key Control Points of Microbial Contamination Risk in Pork Production Processes Using a Quantitative Exposure Assessment Model.

Authors:  Tengteng Yang; Ge Zhao; Yunzhe Liu; Lin Wang; Yubin Gao; Jianmei Zhao; Na Liu; Xiumei Huang; Qingqing Zhang; Junhui Liu; Xiyue Zhang; Junwei Wang; Ying Xu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interventions Applied during Primary Processing to Reduce Microbial Contamination on Pig Carcasses.

Authors:  Nevijo Zdolec; Aurelia Kotsiri; Kurt Houf; Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez; Bojan Blagojevic; Nedjeljko Karabasil; Morgane Salines; Dragan Antic
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-15

8.  Quantitative Bio-Mapping of Salmonella and Indicator Organisms at Different Stages in a Commercial Pork Processing Facility.

Authors:  Rossy Bueno López; David A Vargas; Reagan L Jimenez; Diego E Casas; Markus F Miller; Mindy M Brashears; Marcos X Sanchez-Plata
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-25

9.  Effects of slaughtering operations on carcass contamination in an Irish pork production plant.

Authors:  Paul Wheatley; Efstathios S Giotis; Aideen I McKevitt
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.146

10.  Occupational Exposure and Carriage of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes (tetW, ermB) in Pig Slaughterhouse Workers.

Authors:  Liese Van Gompel; Wietske Dohmen; Roosmarijn E C Luiken; Martijn Bouwknegt; Lourens Heres; Eri van Heijnsbergen; Betty G M Jongerius-Gortemaker; Peter Scherpenisse; Gerdit D Greve; Monique H G Tersteeg-Zijderveld; Katharina Wadepohl; Ana Sofia Ribeiro Duarte; Violeta Muñoz-Gómez; Jennie Fischer; Magdalena Skarżyńska; Dariusz Wasyl; Jaap A Wagenaar; Bert A P Urlings; Alejandro Dorado-García; Inge M Wouters; Dick J J Heederik; Heike Schmitt; Lidwien A M Smit
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.779

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.