Literature DB >> 14751686

Phenotypic and genetic diversity of Lactococcus lactis and Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from Northern Spain starter-free farmhouse cheeses.

Susana Delgado1, Baltasar Mayo.   

Abstract

To evaluate a previous phenotypic classification of lactococci, 39 presumed lactococcal strains were classified by molecular techniques. The strains were also subjected to several typing techniques to estimate the phenotypic and genetic diversity present in original populations from starter-free farmhouse cheeses. Partial Amplified rDNA Restriction Analysis (partial ARDRA) with either restriction enzyme MboII or HhaI divided these isolates into four distinctive groups. Sequencing of representative amplicons identified 29 isolates as belonging to Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (24) and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (5). The remaining 10 isolates were shown to be Enterococcus durans (8) and Enterococcus faecalis (2), which were misclassified by the traditional tests. Thus, partial ARDRA was successfully used to classify wild Lactococcus-like strains into Lactococcus and Enterococcus species. The technique also allowed differentiation of L. lactis strains at subspecies level. The 29 strains of L. lactis showed five different fermentation profiles, four distinct Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) profiles, and 14 unrelated profiles by both Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analyzed by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (RFLP-PFGE) and Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Using the same techniques, the 10 enterococcal strains showed four fermentation profiles, four RADP, and six by RFLP-PFGE and SDS-PAGE, respectively. Several typing techniques, especially RFLP-PFGE and SDS-PAGE, revealed wide phenotypic and genetic variability in both the lactococcal and enterococcal isolates. Two simple, rapid and cheap techniques (partial ARDRA and SDS-PAGE) are proposed as reliable tools for the classification and typing of new lactococcal-like isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751686     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00323-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Lactococcus lactis Isolates from Nondairy Sources with Potential Dairy Applications Reveals Extensive Phenotype-Genotype Disparity and Implications for a Revised Species.

Authors:  Daniel Cavanagh; Aidan Casey; Eric Altermann; Paul D Cotter; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Olivia McAuliffe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparative phenotypic and molecular genetic profiling of wild Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains of the L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotypes, isolated from starter-free cheeses made of raw milk.

Authors:  Elena Fernández; Angel Alegría; Susana Delgado; M Cruz Martín; Baltasar Mayo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Plasmids of raw milk cheese isolate Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis DPC3901 suggest a plant-based origin for the strain.

Authors:  Vincenzo Fallico; Olivia McAuliffe; Gerald F Fitzgerald; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  RAPD and rep-PCR fingerprinting for characterization of Bifidobacterium species.

Authors:  J Krízová; A Spanová; B Rittich
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Characterisation of thermotolerant cocci from indigenous flora of 'leben' in algerian arid area and DNA identification of atypical Lactococcus lactis strains.

Authors:  Farid Bensalah; Christine Delorme; P Renault
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Factors influencing biogenic amines accumulation in dairy products.

Authors:  Daniel M Linares; Beatriz Del Río; Victor Ladero; Noelia Martínez; María Fernández; María Cruz Martín; Miguel A Alvarez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Current Trends of Enterococci in Dairy Products: A Comprehensive Review of Their Multiple Roles.

Authors:  Maria de Lurdes Enes Dapkevicius; Bruna Sgardioli; Sandra P A Câmara; Patrícia Poeta; Francisco Xavier Malcata
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-10

8.  Comparison of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis Strains isolated from water and clinical samples: antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic relationships.

Authors:  Gonzalo Castillo-Rojas; Marisa Mazari-Hiríart; Sergio Ponce de León; Rosa I Amieva-Fernández; Raúl A Agis-Juárez; Johannes Huebner; Yolanda López-Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selection and Characteristics of Fermented Salted Seafood (jeotgal)-Originated Strains with Excellent S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) Production and Probiotics Efficacy.

Authors:  Min-Jeong Kim; Sunhyun Park; Ran-Sook Lee; Sang-Dong Lim; Hyo Jin Kim; Myung-Ki Lee
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Comparative genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecalis: insights into their environmental adaptations.

Authors:  Qiuwen He; Qiangchuan Hou; Yanjie Wang; Jing Li; Weicheng Li; Lai-Yu Kwok; Zhihong Sun; Heping Zhang; Zhi Zhong
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.969

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.