Literature DB >> 14751514

For X-irradiated normal human fibroblasts, only half of cell inactivation results from chromosomal damage.

Kerstin Borgmann1, Mirco Dede, Agnieszka Wrona, Ingo Brammer, Jens Overgaard, Ekkehard Dikomey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the relationship between residual double-strand breaks (dsbs), chromosomal damage, and cell inactivation for X-irradiated normal human fibroblasts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The experiments were performed with 12 normal human fibroblast strains and, for comparison, a fibroblast line from a LiFraumeni patient (LFS2800), a squamous cell carcinoma line (FaDu), and CHO cells. Cells were irradiated in plateau phase, which was followed by immediate or delayed (14 h) plating. Chromosomal damage was measured by metaphase technique and loss of proliferative capacity by colony-forming assay. The data obtained were compared with residual double-strand breaks measured previously (Dikomey et al. IJROBP 2000;46:481-490).
RESULTS: For each fibroblast strain, the number of lethal chromosome aberrations (CAs) increased with dose, but with a substantial variation among the strains (coefficient of variation = 20%-26%). The number of lethal aberrations was significantly correlated with the number of residual dsbs measured for the same strain (r(2) = 0.71, p = 0.0006). The residual dsbs were assumed to represent both non- and also mis-rejoined dsbs. There was a significant correlation between lethal aberrations and cell survival, but only for delayed and not immediate plating (r(2) = 0.69, p < 0.0008 vs. r(2) = 0.19, p = 0.16). For delayed plating, the ratio between lethal events (LEs) and CAs amounted to LE:CA = 2.0 +/- 0.05:1, indicating that on average, only half of cell inactivation resulted from chromosomal damage. The other 50% was attributed to the p53-dependent permanent G1 arrest, because cells lacking in functional p53 (LFS2800, FaDu, CHO) showed a ratio of LE:CA = 1.01 +/- 0.02:1.
CONCLUSION: On average, up to 50% of the inactivation of X-irradiated normal human fibroblasts is a result of lethal chromosome aberrations, whereas the rest is due to a p53-dependent process, probably permanent G1 arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751514     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Influence of homologous recombinational repair on cell survival and chromosomal aberration induction during the cell cycle in gamma-irradiated CHO cells.

Authors:  Paul F Wilson; John M Hinz; Salustra S Urbin; Peter B Nham; Larry H Thompson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Effect of irradiation on the expression of DNA repair genes studied in human fibroblasts by real-time qPCR using three methods of reference gene validation.

Authors:  Sebastian Reuther; Martina Reiter; Annette Raabe; Ekkehard Dikomey
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Targeting of β1 integrins impairs DNA repair for radiosensitization of head and neck cancer cells.

Authors:  E Dickreuter; I Eke; M Krause; K Borgmann; M A van Vugt; N Cordes
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  EGF receptor inhibition radiosensitizes NSCLC cells by inducing senescence in cells sustaining DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Fabian Morsbach; David Sander; Liliana Gheorghiu; Akash Nanda; Cyril Benes; Malte Kriegs; Mechthild Krause; Ekkehard Dikomey; Michael Baumann; Jochen Dahm-Daphi; Jeffrey Settleman; Henning Willers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Afatinib increases sensitivity to radiation in non-small cell lung cancer cells with acquired EGFR T790M mutation.

Authors:  Shirong Zhang; Xiaoliang Zheng; Haixiu Huang; Kan Wu; Bing Wang; Xufeng Chen; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-20

Review 6.  Cellular Pathways in Response to Ionizing Radiation and Their Targetability for Tumor Radiosensitization.

Authors:  Patrick Maier; Linda Hartmann; Frederik Wenz; Carsten Herskind
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Enhancing radiosensitivity of melanoma cells through very high dose rate pulses released by a plasma focus device.

Authors:  Francesca Buontempo; Ester Orsini; Isabella Zironi; Lorenzo Isolan; Alessandra Cappellini; Stefania Rapino; Agostino Tartari; Domiziano Mostacci; Giorgio Cucchi; Alberto Maria Martelli; Marco Sumini; Gastone Castellani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Targeting CREB-binding protein overrides LPS induced radioresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Mira Y Gökyildirim; Ulrich Grandel; Katja Hattar; Gabriele Dahlem; Elena Schuetz; Florian H Leinberger; Fabian Eberle; Ulf Sibelius; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Ekkehard Dikomey; Florentine S B Subtil
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-06-22

9.  Comparison of the repair of potentially lethal damage after low- and high-LET radiation exposure, assessed from the kinetics and fidelity of chromosome rejoining in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Cuihua Liu; Tetsuya Kawata; Guangming Zhou; Yoshiya Furusawa; Ryuichi Kota; Atsuhiro Kumabe; Shinya Sutani; Junichi Fukada; Masayo Mishima; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Kerry George; Francis Cucinotta
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.724

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.