Literature DB >> 14751362

Combination of LHRH analog with somatostatin analog and dexamethasone versus chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomized phase II study.

Meletios A Dimopoulos1, Christos Kiamouris, Dimitra Gika, Charalambos Deliveliotis, Aris Giannopoulos, Anastasios Zervas, Christos Alamanis, Constantinos Constantinidis, Michael Koutsilieris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in a randomized Phase II study. HRPC presents a challenging therapeutic problem. Salvage chemotherapy is the usual approach at this stage of the disease. The combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog with a somatostatin analog and dexamethasone has produced objective clinical responses in HRPC.
METHODS: Forty patients with HRPC were randomized to receive one of two treatments. Group 1 underwent chemotherapy (estramustine 140 mg three times daily and etoposide 100 mg orally for 21 days) and group 2 the combination of a somatostatin analog (lanreotide 30 mg intramuscularly every 14 days) and dexamethasone (4 mg tapered to 1 mg), in addition to androgen ablation by orchiectomy or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog (triptorelin 3.75 mg intramuscularly every 28 days). The clinical and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, overall survival, time to progression, and toxicity were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The data of 20 patients in group 1 and 18 in group 2 were analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were similar in the two groups at study entry. A PSA response (decrease of greater than 50%) was observed in 45% of group 1 and 44% of group 2. The difference was not statistically significant. A partial clinical response was observed in 29% and 30% of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Again, the difference was not statistically significant. Changes in performance status and pain score during treatment were not significantly different in the two groups. Hematologic toxicity was more frequent in group 1 (80% of patients), and mild diabetes was more frequent in group 2 (22% of patients). The overall survival was 18.8 months in group 1 and 18 months in group 2 (not statistically significant). The time to progression was 6 versus 4 months and, in the PSA responder subgroup, it was 8 versus 7.7 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (neither difference was statistically significant).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our randomized Phase II study indicated that the new combination treatment (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog, somatostatin analog, and dexamethasone) may be equally effective as salvage chemotherapy in patients with HRPC in terms of the clinical and PSA response, overall survival, and time to progression. A larger prospective Phase III trial is required to confirm our observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751362     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Phase I Trial of the Combination of Docetaxel, Prednisone, and Pasireotide in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Manish K Thakur; Lance Heilbrun; Kimberlee Dobson; Julie Boerner; Karri Stark; Jing Li; Daryn Smith; Elisabeth Heath; Joseph Fontana; Ulka Vaishampayan
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  [Somatostatin analogs for the treatment of advanced, hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a possibility for secondary hormonal ablation?].

Authors:  D Schilling; R Küfer; S Kruck; A Stenzl; M A Kuczyk; A S Merseburger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Alopecia with endocrine therapies in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Vishal Saggar; Shenhong Wu; Maura N Dickler; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-13

Review 4.  Non-hormonal systemic therapy in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and metastases: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care's Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group.

Authors:  Eric Winquist; Tricia Waldron; Scott Berry; D Scott Ernst; Sébastien Hotte; Himu Lukka
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Clinical Efficacy of a Novel Therapeutic Principle, Anakoinosis.

Authors:  Daniel Heudobler; Michael Rechenmacher; Florian Lüke; Martin Vogelhuber; Sebastian Klobuch; Simone Thomas; Tobias Pukrop; Christina Hackl; Wolfgang Herr; Lina Ghibelli; Christopher Gerner; Albrecht Reichle
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  A review of the use of somatostatin analogs in oncology.

Authors:  Ozge Keskin; Suayib Yalcin
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Evidence for the Possible Biological Significance of the igf-1 Gene Alternative Splicing in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anastassios Philippou; Athanasios Armakolas; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.