Literature DB >> 14751357

Minor modifications in apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage T2 prostate cancer reduce positive surgical margin incidence.

Brett A Laven1, Nejd F Alsikafi, Ximing J Yang, Charles B Brendler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe modifications in the apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in men with palpable disease that reduce the incidence of positive apical surgical margins. Positive surgical margins occur in up to 45% of patients undergoing RRP, even in contemporary series. The apex is the most common site of positive margins, and patients with palpable (clinical Stage T2) disease are more likely to have positive surgical margins than patients with nonpalpable (clinical Stage T1c) disease.
METHODS: Ninety-five men, 48 to 77 years old (mean age 59.6) with clinical Stage T2 tumors underwent RRP between October 1998 and May 2001. Surgical modifications included identification of the prostatic urethral junction by dissection of the levator ani muscle from the prostate and partial transection of the puboprostatic ligaments; variable division of the membranous urethra 1 to 3 mm distal to the prostatic urethral junction; division of prostatic ischial ligaments before dividing the catheter and posterior membranous urethra; and division of the neurovascular bundle at the urogenital diaphragm before liberating the prostate from the rectum.
RESULTS: Positive surgical margins occurred in only 8 (8.4%) of 95 patients, even though tumor extended beyond the prostatic capsule in 55% of cases. Only 2 (2.1%) of the 95 patients had isolated positive apical surgical margins. Urinary continence was not adversely affected by these modifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Easily applied modifications in the apical dissection of RRP significantly reduce the incidence of positive apical margins in patients with clinical Stage T2 prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751357     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Cancer Care Ontario Guidelines for radical prostatectomy: striving for continuous quality improvement in community practice.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; Christopher Newell; John F Amrhein; Ken J Newell
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Randomized trial comparing an anterograde versus a retrograde approach to open radical prostatectomy: results in terms of positive margin rate.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Cristiano Cristini; Magnus Von Heland; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Blunt apical dissection during anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kazunori Namiki; Ali Kasraeian; Saif Yacoub; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-02-06

4.  Improvement of the surgical curability of locally confined prostate cancer including non-organ-confined high-risk disease through retropubic radical prostatectomy with intentional wide resection.

Authors:  Eijiro Okajima; Motokiyo Yoshikawa; Yasumasa Masuda; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Nobumichi Tanaka; Akihide Hirayama; Keiji Shimada; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Yoshihiko Hirao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Steven Dong; Adam Levinson; David Samadi; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.