Literature DB >> 14751328

Patient adherence to skin self-examination. effect of nurse intervention with photographs.

Susan A Oliveria1, Stephen W Dusza, Deborah L Phelan, Jamie S Ostroff, Marianne Berwick, Allan C Halpern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from a single case-control study suggest that skin self-examination (SSE) has the potential to reduce mortality from melanoma by 63%. Despite these encouraging results, SSE rates are low. Few prospective studies of interventions to increase SSE in high-risk cohorts have been performed. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a brief nurse-delivered intervention using digital photographs on patients' adherence to performing SSE. DESIGN SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Patients at high risk for melanoma skin cancer (five or more dysplastic nevi) (N=100) were recruited from the outpatient Pigmented Lesion Clinic at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. All participants had baseline whole-body digital photography as part of their clinical evaluation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized: Group A (n =49) received a teaching intervention (physician and nurse education module) with a photo book (personal whole-body photographs compiled in the form of a booklet, with nurse instruction on how to use the photographs); and Group B (n =51) received the teaching intervention only without a photo book. MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES: Self-administered questionnaires were provided at three intervals: baseline, post-teaching intervention, and at the 4-month post-baseline visit. To assess adherence with SSE, patients were asked, "How many times in the past 4 months did you (or someone else) usually, thoroughly examine your skin?"
RESULTS: In Group A (teaching intervention with photo book), 10.2% of the patients at baseline reported skin examination three or more times during the past 4 months, while 61.2% reported skin examination three or more times at the 4-month follow-up (p =0.039 for paired comparison). In Group B (teaching intervention only), nearly 20% of the patients at baseline reported skin examination three or more times during the past 4 months, while 37% reported skin examination three or more times at the 4-month follow-up (p =0.63). The increase in reported skin examination was compared between the two groups (>51% v >17.6%, p =0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a brief nurse-delivered intervention is effective at increasing patient adherence with SSE. Utilizing digital photographs as an adjunct to screening appeared to increase patient adherence to performing SSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751328     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  22 in total

1.  Piloting the Use of Smartphones, Reminders, and Accountability Partners to Promote Skin Self-Examinations in Patients with Total Body Photography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Marek; Emily Y Chu; Michael E Ming; Zeeshan A Khan; Carrie L Kovarik
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 2.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Understanding Skin Screening Practices Among Children at Elevated Risk for Melanoma to Inform Interventions for Melanoma Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Bridget G Parsons; Jennifer L Hay; Lisa G Aspinwall; Kelsey Zaugg; Angela Zhu; Ryan H Mooney; Stephanie Z Klein; Douglas Grossman; Sancy A Leachman; Yelena P Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The epidemiology, prevention, and detection of melanoma.

Authors:  Adam I Riker; Nicolas Zea; Tan Trinh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

5.  Use of technology for educating melanoma patients.

Authors:  Nicole Marble; Lois J Loescher; Kyung Hee Lim; Heather Hiscox
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Screening and prevention measures for melanoma: is there a survival advantage?

Authors:  Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Skin cancer screening behaviours among individuals with a strong family history of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  N A Kasparian; J K McLoone; B Meiser; P N Butow; J M Simpson; G J Mann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors for individuals at elevated risk.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Bridgid M Conn; Tammy Stump; Bridget Grahmann; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Components of a successful intervention for monthly skin self-examination for early detection of melanoma: the "Check It Out" trial.

Authors:  Katherine B Lee; Martin A Weinstock; Patricia M Risica
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Thoroughness of skin examination by melanoma patients: influence of age, sex and partner.

Authors:  Susan L Boone; Jerod Stapleton; Rob Turrisi; Sara Ortiz; June K Robinson; Kimberly A Mallett
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.