Literature DB >> 14751152

In vitro chemoresistance and biomarker profiles are unique for histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Noelle Gillette Cloven1, Ainura Kyshtoobayeva, Robert A Burger, Ing Ru Yu, John P Fruehauf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a relationship between histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer and chemoresistance, we evaluated ovarian carcinomas of six histologic subtypes and correlated histology with in vitro drug response. Biomarker profiles (p53, Her-2 neu, and EGFR) were also evaluated to determine if their expression patterns were associated with histology.
METHODS: In vitro drug response profiles for different histologic subsets of epithelial ovarian carcinomas exposed to standard relevant chemotherapy agents were determined in the Extreme Drug Resistance assay (EDR). Immunohistochemistry techniques were employed to determine biomarker expression.
RESULTS: Of 5195 referred serial cases of epithelial ovarian cancer, there were 2660 papillary serous, 303 endometrioid, 142 mucinous, 102 clear cell, 952 undifferentiated carcinomas, and 42 tumors of low malignant potential. For the samples as a whole, the incidences of extreme drug resistance to the tested chemotherapeutic agents were cisplatin 10%, carboplatin 16%, cyclophosphamide 16%, doxorubicin 40%, gemcitabine 21%, paclitaxel 22%, and topotecan 13%. When compared to papillary serous tumors, mucinous tumors were more frequently resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 18%) but less frequently resistant to topotecan (13% vs. 5%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 16%). Endometrioid tumors were less resistant to cisplatin (10% vs. 6%) and doxorubicin (42% vs. 20%). Clear cell and undifferentiated tumors had the lowest rates of EDR to paclitaxel (13% and 18%) and cyclophosphamide (7% and 11%), while borderline tumors showed high rates of EDR to these agents (52% and 63%, respectively). With respect to biomarker profiles, mP53 was detected in 46%, Her-2 neu in 16%, and EGFR in 30% of the cases evaluated. As compared to all other subtypes, clear cell carcinomas had significantly higher Her-2 neu expression (19%). Relative to papillary serous carcinomas, borderline tumors exhibited significantly lower rates of mP53 expression (60% vs.17%).
CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences in the frequencies of extreme drug resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and biomarker expression among histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. The data collected in this investigation may provide a guide for stratification of patients entering clinical trials based on histology and biomarker expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751152     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Apoptosis-related mRNA expression profiles of ovarian cancer cell lines following cisplatin treatment.

Authors:  Joohee Yoon; Eung-Sam Kim; Sung Jong Lee; Chang-Wook Park; Hyung Jin Cha; Bee Hak Hong; Kwan Yong Choi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Genetic variation in the progesterone receptor gene and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Kathryn L Terry; Immaculata De Vivo; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Patrick M Sluss; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a continuing enigma.

Authors:  David S P Tan; Stan Kaye
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Potential signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for overcoming chemoresistance in mucinous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Emiko Niiro; Sachiko Morioka; Kana Iwai; Yuki Yamada; Kenji Ogawa; Naoki Kawahara; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2018-01-17

5.  Efficacy of taxane and platinum-based chemotherapy guided by extreme drug resistance assay in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Won Deok Joo; Ji Young Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Hang Jo Yoo; Hyun Jin Roh; Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Advances in the Application of Radionuclide-Labeled HER2 Affibody for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Xianwen Hu; Dandan Li; Yujie Fu; Jiashen Zheng; Zelong Feng; Jiong Cai; Pan Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Genomic analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  John Farley; Laurent L Ozbun; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 8.  Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in epithelial ovarian cancer: current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  Doris R Siwak; Mark Carey; Bryan T Hennessy; Catherine T Nguyen; Mollianne J McGahren Murray; Laura Nolden; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Cathepsins B, L and cystatin C in cyst fluid of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Eva Kolwijck; Leon F A G Massuger; Chris M G Thomas; Paul N Span; Marta Krasovec; Janko Kos; Fred C G J Sweep
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.