OBJECTIVES: To estimate the objective response rate and toxicity associated with alternating megestrol acetate (MA) and tamoxifen citrate (T) in women with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Consenting patients with measurable recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma were eligible if they had not received prior cytotoxic or hormonal treatment. MA 80 mg BID x 3 weeks alternating with T 20 mg BID x 3 weeks orally was given. RESULTS: Of 61 patients entered, 56 eligible patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifteen patients responded (12 complete, 3 partial) for an overall response rate of 27% (90% Confidence Interval: 17-38%). In 8 of 15 (53%) responders, response duration exceeded 20 months. The response rate was 38% in patients with histologic grade 1 tumors (n = 16), 24% in those with grade 2 disease (n = 17), and 22% among patients with grade 3 disease (n = 23). Women less than or equal to 60 years (n = 16) appear to have a better response rate than those >60 years (n = 40), 44% versus 20%. The response rate in patients with extra pelvic disease (n = 42) was 31% as compared to 14% in those with strictly pelvic and/or vaginal disease (n = 14). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months and median overall survival was 14.0 months. Two patients experienced a grade 4 thromboembolic event. Additional toxicities included one of each grade 3 gastrointestinal, grade 3 neurologic, and grade 3 genitourinary. CONCLUSION: A regimen of alternating megestrol acetate and tamoxifen is active in treating endometrial cancer and may result in a prolonged complete response (CR) in some patients.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the objective response rate and toxicity associated with alternating megestrol acetate (MA) and tamoxifen citrate (T) in women with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Consenting patients with measurable recurrent or advanced endometrial carcinoma were eligible if they had not received prior cytotoxic or hormonal treatment. MA 80 mg BID x 3 weeks alternating with T 20 mg BID x 3 weeks orally was given. RESULTS: Of 61 patients entered, 56 eligible patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifteen patients responded (12 complete, 3 partial) for an overall response rate of 27% (90% Confidence Interval: 17-38%). In 8 of 15 (53%) responders, response duration exceeded 20 months. The response rate was 38% in patients with histologic grade 1 tumors (n = 16), 24% in those with grade 2 disease (n = 17), and 22% among patients with grade 3 disease (n = 23). Women less than or equal to 60 years (n = 16) appear to have a better response rate than those >60 years (n = 40), 44% versus 20%. The response rate in patients with extra pelvic disease (n = 42) was 31% as compared to 14% in those with strictly pelvic and/or vaginal disease (n = 14). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months and median overall survival was 14.0 months. Two patients experienced a grade 4 thromboembolic event. Additional toxicities included one of each grade 3 gastrointestinal, grade 3 neurologic, and grade 3 genitourinary. CONCLUSION: A regimen of alternating megestrol acetate and tamoxifen is active in treating endometrial cancer and may result in a prolonged complete response (CR) in some patients.
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Michael W Sill; Meaghan E Tenney; Christopher J Darus; David Griffin; Theresa L Werner; Peter G Rose; Robert Behrens Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Gini F Fleming; Virginia L Filiaci; Brandon Marzullo; Richard J Zaino; Susan A Davidson; Michael Pearl; Vicky Makker; James J Burke; Susan L Zweizig; Linda Van Le; Parviz Hanjani; Gordon Downey; Joan L Walker; Henry D Reyes; Kimberly K Leslie Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kari L Ring; Melinda S Yates; Rosemarie Schmandt; Michaela Onstad; Qian Zhang; Joseph Celestino; Suet-Ying Kwan; Karen H Lu Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Brian M Slomovitz; Yunyun Jiang; Melinda S Yates; Pamela T Soliman; Taren Johnston; Maureen Nowakowski; Charles Levenback; Qian Zhang; Kari Ring; Mark F Munsell; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu; Robert L Coleman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 44.544