Literature DB >> 14750744

Methylmercury formation in a wetland mesocosm amended with sulfate.

S M Harmon1, J K King, J B Gladden, G T Chandler, L A Newman.   

Abstract

This study used an experimental model to evaluate methylmercury accumulation when the soil of a constructed wetland is amended with sulfate. The model was planted with Schoenoplectus californicus and designed to reduce wastestream metals and metal-related toxicity. The soil was varied during construction to provide a control and two sulfate treatments which were equally efficient at overall mercury and copper removal. After an initial stabilization period, methylmercury concentrations in porewater were up to three times higher in the sulfate-treated porewater (0.5-1.6 ng/L) than in the control (<0.02-0.5 ng/L). Mean percent methylmercury was 9.0% in the control with 18.5 and 16.6% in the low- and high-sulfate treatments, respectively. Methylmercury concentrations measured in mesocosm surface water did not reflect the differences between the control and the sulfate treatments that were noted in porewater. The mean bulk sediment methylmercury concentration in the top 6 cm of the low-sulfate treatment (2.33 ng/g) was significantly higher than other treatment means which ranged from 0.96 to 1.57 ng/g. Total mercury in sediment ranged from 20.8 to 33.4 ng/g, with no differences between treatments. Results suggest that the non-sulfate-amended control was equally effective in removing metals while keeping mercury methylation low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14750744     DOI: 10.1021/es030513g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Dwayne A Elias; Amy M Kucken; Steven D Brown; Anthony V Palumbo; Christopher W Schadt; Judy D Wall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Response to Julian et al. (2015) "comment on and reinterpretation of Gabriel et al. (2014) 'fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the everglades protection area'".

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Don Axelrad; William Orem; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Spatial and temporal variation of total mercury and methylmercury in lacustrine wetland in Korea.

Authors:  Moon-Kyung Kim; Young-Min Lee; Kyung-Duk Zoh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Bioremediation of copper in sediments from a constructed wetland ex situ with the novel bacterium Cupriavidus basilensis SRS.

Authors:  Alex Kugler; Robin L Brigmon; Abby Friedman; Fanny M Coutelot; Shawn W Polson; John C Seaman; Waltena Simpson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Fish mercury and surface water sulfate relationships in the Everglades Protection Area.

Authors:  Mark C Gabriel; Nicole Howard; Todd Z Osborne
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.