Literature DB >> 14750292

A comparison of methods to obtain active parental consent for an international student survey.

Barbara J McMorris1, Jackie Clements, Tracy Evans-Whipp, Danielle Gangnes, Lyndal Bond, John W Toumbourou, Richard F Catalano.   

Abstract

Many school-based research efforts require active parental consent for student participation. Maximizing rates of consent form return and agreement is an important issue, because sample representativeness may be compromised when these rates are low. This article compares two methods for obtaining active parental consent: return of consent forms in the mail versus return by students to their classrooms. The methods were tested in a pilot study of 46 schools (1,058 students), with half of the schools randomly allocated to each of the alternative methods. A hierarchical nonlinear model of consent form return and agreement rates suggests that the student-delivered method is more successful at producing higher rates of consent form return and agreement to participate in the study, after controlling for school-level characteristics. The authors discuss the findings and their implications for other researchers engaged in school-based research with adolescents.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14750292     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03257532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  8 in total

1.  The process of research in international settings: from risk assessment to program development and intervention.

Authors:  M Catherin Freier; Duane McBride; Gary Hopkins; Talin Babikian; Lloyd Richardson; Herb Helm
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Impact of a physician recommendation and parental immunization attitudes on receipt or intention to receive adolescent vaccines.

Authors:  Lisa M Gargano; Natasha L Herbert; Julia E Painter; Jessica M Sales; Christopher Morfaw; Kimberly Rask; Dennis Murray; Ralph J DiClemente; James M Hughes
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Influence of sources of information about influenza vaccine on parental attitudes and adolescent vaccine receipt.

Authors:  Lisa M Gargano; Natasha L Underwood; Jessica M Sales; Katherine Seib; Christopher Morfaw; Dennis Murray; Ralph J DiClemente; James M Hughes
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  School-Located Vaccination Clinics for Adolescents: Correlates of Acceptance Among Parents.

Authors:  Lisa M Gargano; Paul Weiss; Natasha L Underwood; Katherine Seib; Jessica M Sales; Tara M Vogt; Kimberly Rask; Christopher Morfaw; Dennis L Murray; Ralph J DiClemente; James M Hughes
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-08

5.  Evaluating Active Parental Consent Procedures for School Programming: Addressing the Sensitive Topic of Suicide Prevention.

Authors:  Christine M Wienke Totura; Krista Kutash; Christa D Labouliere; Marc S Karver
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.118

6.  Human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescents in Georgia.

Authors:  Natasha L Underwood; Paul Weiss; Lisa M Gargano; Katherine Seib; Kimberly J Rask; Christopher Morfaw; Dennis Murray; Ralph J DiClemente; James M Hughes; Jessica M Sales
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Improving survey response rates from parents in school-based research using a multi-level approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Schilpzand; Emma Sciberras; Daryl Efron; Vicki Anderson; Jan M Nicholson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A clustered randomised trial examining the effect of social marketing and community mobilisation on the age of uptake and levels of alcohol consumption by Australian adolescents.

Authors:  Bosco Rowland; John Winston Toumbourou; Amber Osborn; Rachel Smith; Jessica Kate Hall; Peter Kremer; Adrian B Kelly; Joanne Williams; Eva Leslie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.