Literature DB >> 14750160

Organization of parabrachial projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis: an anterograde tracing study in the rat.

Radhouane Dallel1, Olivier Ricard, Patrick Raboisson.   

Abstract

In recent years, we have accumulated data showing that the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis (Sp5O) contributes to the processing of somatosensory inputs from the orofacial region. Although the parabrachial area (PB) represents the main brainstem relay for autonomic, nociceptive, and gustatory afferents, few data are available regarding the topographical distribution of the efferent projections from the Sp5O to the PB. We have addressed this question with the rat, by using the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. A dense trigeminoparabrachial pathway from the Sp5O toward, predominantly, the ipsilateral PB was revealed. Projections come mainly from the dorsal part of the Sp5O that was found to innervate densely the medial, external medial, and ventral lateral subnuclei. In contrast, the ventral part of the Sp5O projected almost exclusively to an as yet not formally described region, located dorsally and laterally to the lateral tip of the brachium conjunctivum, close to the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus. These results suggest that distinct regions within the Sp5O may be involved in the processing of gustatory and nociceptive information. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14750160     DOI: 10.1002/cne.11043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  10 in total

1.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Christopher S Freet; Patricia S Grigson; Ralph Norgren
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

2.  Distinct Populations of Amygdala Somatostatin-Expressing Neurons Project to the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract and Parabrachial Nucleus.

Authors:  Jane J Bartonjo; Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Fos protein-like immunoreactive neurons induced by electrical stimulation in the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex of rats with chronically injured peripheral nerve.

Authors:  Naoko Fujisawa; Ryuji Terayama; Daisuke Yamaguchi; Shinji Omura; Takashi Yamashiro; Tomosada Sugimoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Direct Parabrachial-Cortical Connectivity.

Authors:  Fillan Grady; Lila Peltekian; Gabrielle Iverson; Joel C Geerling
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  VGLUT1 or VGLUT2 mRNA-positive neurons in spinal trigeminal nucleus provide collateral projections to both the thalamus and the parabrachial nucleus in rats.

Authors:  Chun-Kui Zhang; Zhi-Hong Li; Yu Qiao; Ting Zhang; Ya-Cheng Lu; Tao Chen; Yu-Lin Dong; Yun-Qing Li; Jin-Lian Li
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.041

6.  A vibrissa pathway that activates the limbic system.

Authors:  Michaël Elbaz; Amalia Callado Perez; Maxime Demers; Shengli Zhao; Conrad Foo; David Kleinfeld; Martin Deschenes
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Molecular ontology of the parabrachial nucleus.

Authors:  Samyukta Karthik; Dake Huang; Yaritza Delgado; Justin J Laing; Lila Peltekian; Gabrielle N Iverson; Fillan Grady; Rebecca L Miller; Corey M McCann; Bernd Fritzsch; Igor Y Iskusnykh; Victor V Chizhikov; Joel C Geerling
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.028

8.  Signal transduction mechanisms underlying group I mGluR-mediated increase in frequency and amplitude of spontaneous EPSCs in the spinal trigeminal subnucleus oralis of the rat.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Song; Eun-Sung Park; Sang-Mi Han; Seung-Ro Han; Dong-Kuk Ahn; Dong-Ho Youn
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.395

9.  Morphology and connections of intratrigeminal cells and axons in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Susan Warren; Paul J May
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Glycine inhibitory dysfunction turns touch into pain through PKCgamma interneurons.

Authors:  Loïs S Miraucourt; Radhouane Dallel; Daniel L Voisin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.