Literature DB >> 14749697

Monitoring amiodarone's toxicities: recommendations, evidence, and clinical practice.

Henry Thomas Stelfox, Sofia B Ahmed, Julie Fiskio, David W Bates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop an explicit evidence-based model of medication monitoring and to evaluate monitoring practices and adverse drug events in patients taking amiodarone at one institution.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1966 through 2000) for English-language publications providing specific monitoring recommendations for amiodarone. A cross-sectional retrospective chart review of 99 outpatients receiving amiodarone therapy between Jan 1, 2000, and Jan 1, 2001, at a large tertiary-care hospital was performed to assess monitoring practices. Adverse drug events were identified by use of structured implicit reviews. The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving the monitoring recommended in the literature and having amiodarone-related adverse drug events.
RESULTS: Forty-three articles were identified that provided specific monitoring recommendations, although no studies were found that compared the outcomes of patients managed with different monitoring regimens. Overall, 70% of the recommended monitoring criteria were satisfied, although only 9 patients (9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3%-15%) received all of the recommended monitoring. Variability in monitoring practices was identified at all stages of the monitoring model. Of the patients, 52 (52%; 95% CI, 42%-62%) received minimum baseline evaluations, 22 (22%; 95% CI, 14%-31%) underwent ongoing surveillance, 75 (75%; 95% CI, 61%-89%) had appropriate responses to abnormal surveillance results, and 71 (71%; 95% CI, 62%-80%) had timely follow-up visits. Of the patients, 8 (8%; 95% CI, 3%-13%) had 9 amiodarone-related adverse drug events, of which 3 were judged to be preventable. Interrater agreement for monitoring processes (kappa = 0.83) and adverse drug events (kappa = 0.67) was good.
CONCLUSIONS: Current standards for amiodarone toxicity monitoring are based on expert opinion with limited evidence to support most recommendations. Monitoring practices appear to vary significantly, with few patients receiving all of the recommended monitoring. Some amiodarone-related adverse drug events may be preventable and patient safety might be improved with a better understanding of monitoring processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749697     DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  19 in total

1.  David Westfall Bates, MD: a conversation with the editor on improving patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes by using information technology. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.

Authors:  David Westfall Bates
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-04

Review 2.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 4.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; J Forth; S Sundar; E Kalu; C A M McNulty; E Sherriff; I D Watson; C Croucher; T M Reynolds; P J Carey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Pitfalls of testing and summary of guidance on safety monitoring with amiodarone and digoxin.

Authors:  W Stuart A Smellie; Jamie J Coleman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-10

Review 4.  Is antiarrhythmic treatment in the elderly different? a review of the specific changes.

Authors:  Vera H M Deneer; Norbert M van Hemel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Thyroid dysfunction from antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Ole-Petter Riksfjord Hamnvik; P Reed Larsen; Ellen Marqusee
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Falling between the cracks: a case of amiodarone toxicity.

Authors:  Constanze Mackenzie; Jaffer Syed; P Timothy Pollak; Gideon Koren
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity: an under-recognized and severe adverse effect?

Authors:  Martin Schwaiblmair; Thomas Berghaus; Thomas Haeckel; Theodor Wagner; Wolfgang von Scheidt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  A rare case of amiodarone-induced hypothyroidism presenting with cardiac tamponade.

Authors:  Ali Motabar; Ramtin Anousheh; Rimon Shaker; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2011-09

Review 9.  Amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy: a critical review.

Authors:  Rod S Passman; Charles L Bennett; Joseph M Purpura; Rashmi Kapur; Lenworth N Johnson; Dennis W Raisch; Dennis P West; Beatrice J Edwards; Steven M Belknap; Dustin B Liebling; Mathew J Fisher; Athena T Samaras; Lisa-Gaye A Jones; Katrina-Marie E Tulas; June M McKoy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Absence of bilateral vision loss from amiodarone: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joel S Mindel; Jill Anderson; Anne Hellkamp; George Johnson; Jeanne E Poole; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.