Literature DB >> 14749631

Ambulatory procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1994-1996.

Sarah Hamilton Boyles1, Anne M Weber, Leslie Meyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe the national rates of ambulatory surgery for urinary incontinence in women. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, a federal database that samples outpatient surgery in the United States. Data from 1994 to 1996 were analyzed for diagnoses and procedures coded using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification, classification system. Age-adjusted rates were calculated with use of the 1990 census population and compared for change over time by using the score test for linear trend.
RESULTS: The estimated number of women undergoing outpatient surgery for urinary incontinence increased from 7,200 in 1994 to 15,900 in 1996 (P=.3), whereas the age-adjusted rate remained stable at approximately 10 procedures per 100,000 women per year. The procedures performed included "other repair of the bladder" (ICD-9-CM code 57.89), "other repair of urinary stress incontinence" (code 59.7), plication of the urethrovesical junction, suprapubic sling operation, retropubic urethral suspension, paraurethral suspension, and levator muscle operation. The mean age of women undergoing these procedures was 58+/-14.5 years. Women undergoing incontinence procedures were 76% white, 0.3% African American, and 24% other (including unknown). Ninety-two percent of the procedures were completed at hospitals, whereas 8% were performed at free-standing ambulatory surgery centers.
CONCLUSION: Between 1994 and 1996, the number of ambulatory surgeries for urinary incontinence in women doubled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749631     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Bladder Symptoms and Attitudes in an Ethnically Diverse Population.

Authors:  Sybil G Dessie; Sonia R Adams; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker; Eman A Elkadry
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Vrishali V Lopes; Christina A Raker; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004.

Authors:  Sallie S Oliphant; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Ambulatory care related to female pelvic floor disorders in the United States, 1995-2006.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Christina A Raker; Deborah L Myers; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Improving the accuracy of prolapse and incontinence procedure epidemiology by utilizing both inpatient and outpatient data.

Authors:  Christopher S Elliott; Kim F Rhoads; Craig V Comiter; Bertha Chen; Eric R Sokol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Disparities in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Authors:  Siobhan M Hartigan; Ariana L Smith
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Applying a Health Equity Lens to Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Oluwateniola Brown; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.966

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.