Literature DB >> 14749583

Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score.

Seow-Yian Tay1, Edward P Sloan, Leslie Zun, Philip Zaret.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was proposed in 1997 to replace the Injury Severity Score (ISS) because it is more sensitive for mortality. We aim to test whether this is true in our patients.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of data from 6,231 consecutive patients over 3 years in the trauma registry of a Level I trauma center studying outcome, ISS, and NISS.
RESULTS: Misclassification rates were 3.97% for the NISS and 4.35% for the ISS. The receiver operating characteristic curve areas were 0.936 and 0.94, respectively. Neither the ISS nor the NISS were well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, 36.11 and 49.28, respectively; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The NISS should not replace the ISS, as they share similar accuracy and calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749583     DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000058311.67607.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  24 in total

1.  Childhood falls: characteristics, outcome, and comparison of the Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  M Bulut; O Koksal; A Korkmaz; M Turan; H Ozguc
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Pattern of Traumatic Injuries and Injury Severity Score in a Major Trauma Center in Shiraz, Southern Iran.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Abbasi; Seyed Mohsen Mousavi; Ali Taheri Akerdi; Mohammad Hadi Niakan; Shahram Bolandparvaz; Shahram Paydar
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-04

3.  Validation of trauma scales: ISS, NISS, RTS and TRISS for predicting mortality in a Colombian population.

Authors:  Carlos Oliver Valderrama-Molina; Nelson Giraldo; Alfredo Constain; Andres Puerta; Camilo Restrepo; Alba León; Fabián Jaimes
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 4.  Systematic review and need assessment of pediatric trauma outcome benchmarking tools for low-resource settings.

Authors:  Etienne St-Louis; Jade Séguin; Daniel Roizblatt; Dan Leon Deckelbaum; Robert Baird; Tarek Razek
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score.

Authors:  Hani O Eid; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Validating scores: a good business for a trauma register.

Authors:  Marcus R Raum
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Trauma in elderly patients: a study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences.

Authors:  M Gioffrè-Florio; L M Murabito; C Visalli; F P Pergolizzi; F Famà
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  A review of injury epidemiology in the UK and Europe: some methodological considerations in constructing rates.

Authors:  Roxana Alexandrescu; Sarah J O'Brien; Fiona E Lecky
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Denver ED Trauma Organ Failure Score outperforms traditional methods of risk stratification in trauma.

Authors:  Jody A Vogel; Nicole Seleno; Emily Hopkins; Christopher B Colwell; Craig Gravitz; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  The exponential function transforms the Abbreviated Injury Scale, which both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.

Authors:  M D Wang; W H Fan; W S Qiu; Z L Zhang; Y N Mo; F Qiu
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.