Public health policy and infertility.

In assisted reproductive technology, three main areas are relevant from a health policy perspective: first, the technical excellence of the services rendered; second, a licensing and monitoring system to control all practitioners and the premises in which they work; and third, legislation to avoid abuse, prevent possible damage to the mother and the child and outlaw techniques unacceptable in a given cultural setting, including mechanisms to ensure the adherence by all to ethical and deontological principles. No one refuses the need to ensure that services offering assisted reproductive technologies adhere to technical excellence and everyone agrees that technical guidelines should exist and should be thoroughly enforced. When it comes to legislating about assisted reproductive techniques and, more specifically, to ruling in favour of limiting the use of existing technology to certain groups and not to others, or to ban altogether individual methods, views are sometimes totally divergent. In countries where legislation is fairly liberal, usually both physicians and the public view legislation with favour; conversely, where a number of restrictions exist, many complain that legislation impairs their ability to offer proper services. The solution seems to be a simple, well-defined, legislative act setting clear principles and providing for the creation of an Authority capable of resolving the myriad of individual problems that invariably arise from applying assisted reproductive techniques. Homo sum et nihil humanum a me alienum puto I am a human being and therefore cannot consider alien to me anything that helps another human being.