Literature DB >> 14747754

Prevalence and distribution of corrective lenses among school-age children.

Alex R Kemper1, David Bruckman, Gary L Freed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No population-based data are available regarding the proportion of school-age children who have corrective lenses in the U.S. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion of children who have corrective lenses (glasses or contact lenses) and to evaluate the association of corrective lenses with age, gender, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, and family income.
METHODS: Children 6 to 18 years of age were identified in the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. National estimates were made of the proportion with corrective lenses. Logistic regression modeling was used to assess factors that were associated with corrective lenses.
RESULTS: Based on the 5,141 children in the 1988 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, an estimated 25.4% of the 52.6 million children between 6 and 18 years had corrective lenses. Girls had greater odds than boys of having corrective lenses (odds ratio, 1.41; p < 0.001). Insured children, regardless of race/ethnicity, and uninsured nonblack/non-Hispanic children had similar odds of having corrective lenses. Compared with uninsured black or Hispanic children (odds ratio, 1), greater odds of corrective lens use was found among uninsured nonblack/non-Hispanic children (odds ratio, 2.29; p = 0.002) and black or Hispanic children with public (odds ratio, 1.67; p = 0.005) or private health insurance (odds ratio,1.77; p = 0.004). Among families with an income > or =200% of the federal poverty level, the odds of having corrective lenses increased with age (p < or = 0.04). In contrast, among those families <200% of the federal poverty level, the odds of having corrective lenses at 12 to 14 years was similar to 15- to 18-year olds (p = 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of corrective lenses suggests that correctable visual impairment is the most common treatable chronic condition of childhood. Income, gender, and race/ethnicity, depending on insurance status, are associated with having corrective lenses. The underlying causes and the impacts of these differences must be understood to ensure optimal delivery of eye care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14747754      PMCID: PMC2562227          DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200401000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Unmet need for eyeglasses: results from the 1994 Robert Wood Johnson Access to Care Survey.

Authors:  L E Hodges; M L Berk
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1999-04

2.  Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Peter Franks; Mark P Doescher; Barry G Saver
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.

Authors:  Nancy E Adler; Katherine Newman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture (1995). Myopia development in childhood.

Authors:  K Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Pediatric vision screening for the family physician.

Authors:  P Broderick
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  The prevalence of corrective lenses among black and white junior high school students.

Authors:  P A Renick
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1972-11

7.  Gender differences in health care access indicators in an urban, low-income community.

Authors:  C Merzel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Eye examination and vision screening in infants, children, and young adults. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Section on Ophthalmology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  The epidemiology of myopia.

Authors:  J Angle; D A Wissmann
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Educational attainment of 10-year-old children with treated and untreated visual defects.

Authors:  S Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum; N Butler
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.449

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Spectacle wear in children given spectacles through a school-based program.

Authors:  Dawn H Messer; G Lynn Mitchell; J Daniel Twelker; Mabel Crescioni
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Corrective lens wear among adolescents: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; James G Gurney; Maya Eibschitz-Tsimhoni; Montea Del Monte
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Patterns of vision care among Medicaid-enrolled children.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Lisa M Cohn; Kevin J Dombkowski
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Prospective Changes in Vestibular and Ocular Motor Impairment After Concussion.

Authors:  R J Elbin; Alicia Sufrinko; Morgan N Anderson; Samantha Mohler; Philip Schatz; Tracey Covassin; Anne Mucha; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Contact lens use and its compliance for care among healthcare workers in Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammed Hamza Khan; Syed Muhammed Mubeen; Tanveer Anjum Chaudhry; Shaharyar Ahmed Khan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.