Literature DB >> 14746983

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of four ivermectin generic formulations in calves.

A Lifschitz1, J Sallovitz, F Imperiale, A Pis, J Jauregui Lorda, C Lanusse.   

Abstract

The plasma concentration profiles of four randomly chosen ivermectin (IVM) generic formulations (IVM G1-G4) were compared after their subcutaneous (SC) administration to healthy calves. The disposition of other avermectin-type endectocide compounds, doramectin (DRM) and abamectin (ABM), was also assessed in the same pharmacokinetic trial. Forty-two parasite-free Aberdeen Angus male calves were randomly allocated into six treatment groups. Animals in each group (n = 7) received SC treatment (200 microg/kg) with one of the commercially available endectocide formulation used in the trial. Blood samples were taken into heparinised vacutainer tubes from the jugular vein prior to and up to 35 days post-treatment. The recovered plasma was analysed by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Large kinetic differences were observed among the DRM, ABM and IVM formulations under evaluation. The DRM plasma concentration profiles were higher than those measured for ABM and all the IVM generic formulations. The higher and sustained plasma concentrations of DRM accounted for greater area under concentration-time curve (AUC) and longer mean residence time (MRT) values compared to those obtained for both ABM and the IVM generic preparations. The pattern of IVM absorption from the site of subcutaneous administration showed differences among the generic formulations under evaluation. The IVM G2 preparation showed higher peak plasma concentration and AUC values (P < 0.05) compared to those obtained after the administration of the IVM G1 formulation. Longer (P < 0.05) MRT values were obtained after the administration of the IVM G3 compared to other IVM generic preparations. The kinetic behaviour of ABM did not show significant differences with that described for most of the IVM formulations. This study demonstrates that major differences on drug kinetic behaviour may be observed when using different endectocide injectable formulations in cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746983     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  8 in total

1.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of ivermectin alone and a novel formulation of ivermectin and rafoxanide in calves and sheep.

Authors:  H A El-Banna; A Goudah; H El-Zorba; S Abd-El-Rahman
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Effectiveness evaluation of several cattle anthelmintics via the fecal egg count reduction test.

Authors:  T A Yazwinski; C A Tucker; J A Hornsby; J G Powell; J L Reynolds; Z B Johnson; W Lindsey; T K Silver
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Survival and Fecundity of Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles albimanus Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) After Ingesting Bovine Blood Containing Various Veterinary Systemic Parasiticides.

Authors:  Staci M Dreyer; Jefferson A Vaughan
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 4.  Is anthelmintic resistance a concern for the control of human soil-transmitted helminths?

Authors:  Jozef Vercruysse; Marco Albonico; Jerzy M Behnke; Andrew C Kotze; Roger K Prichard; James S McCarthy; Antonio Montresor; Bruno Levecke
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Current therapeutic applications and pharmacokinetic modulations of ivermectin.

Authors:  Khan Sharun; T S Shyamkumar; V A Aneesha; Kuldeep Dhama; Abhijit Motiram Pawde; Amar Pal
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 6.  Confounding factors affecting faecal egg count reduction as a measure of anthelmintic efficacy.

Authors:  Eric R Morgan; Carlos Lanusse; Laura Rinaldi; Johannes Charlier; Jozef Vercruysse
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Oral susceptibility to ivermectin is over fifty times greater in a wild population of Anopheles albimanus mosquitoes from Belize than the STECLA laboratory reference strain of this mosquito.

Authors:  Staci M Dreyer; Kelsey J Morin; Marla Magaña; Marie Pott; Donovan Leiva; Nicole L Achee; John P Grieco; Jefferson A Vaughan
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Relative bioavailability and comparative clinical efficacy of different ivermectin oral formulations in lambs.

Authors:  Gonzalo Suárez; Luis Alvarez; Daniel Castells; Oscar Correa; Pietro Fagiolino; Carlos Lanusse
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.