Literature DB >> 14746951

Elective cervical cerclage versus serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in a population at high risk for preterm delivery.

Katie M Groom1, Phillip R Bennett, Monali Golara, Angeli Thalon, Andrew H Shennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcome for women at risk of preterm delivery undergoing elective cervical cerclage in the first trimester or serial transvaginal assessment of cervical length with cerclage only if indicated (control cases).
DESIGN: A matched case control study.
SETTING: Prematurity clinic at two London teaching hospitals. POPULATION: Women at high risk for preterm delivery.
METHODS: Cases of elective cervical cerclage were matched for maternal age, ethnic group, previous cervical surgery, previous second trimester loss and early preterm delivery to women undergoing serial ultrasound surveillance of cervical length. Pregnancy outcome data was collected. Data was analysed using Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney and Student's t-tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestation at delivery, rate of delivery <24, 24-32 and 32-37 weeks gestation.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of elective cervical cerclage were matched to control cases. Both groups were similar for maternal age, ethnic group, previous cervical surgery, previous second trimester loss and early preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage was performed in 14 (36%) of the control cases due to cervical changes. There was no significant difference in median gestation at delivery (266 days versus 260 days P=0.9), number delivering <24 weeks (15% versus 13% P=0.9), at 24-32 weeks (7.5% versus 15% P=0.6) and at 32-37 weeks (15% versus 13% P=0.9).
CONCLUSION: Serial transvaginal ultrasound surveillance of cervical length in women at high risk of preterm delivery appears to reduce cerclage rates without compromising pregnancy outcome. A large multicentered randomised trial is required to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746951     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00289-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

Authors:  Roberto Romero; Jimmy Espinoza; Offer Erez; Sonia Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful?

Authors:  Joel D Larma; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Elective and emergency cervical cerclage and immediate pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrea Liddiard; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Lena Crichton
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-11-28

4.  Cervical length distribution and other sonographic ancillary findings of singleton nulliparous patients at midgestation.

Authors:  Maged M Costantine; Lynda Ugwu; William A Grobman; Brian M Mercer; Alan T N Tita; Dwight J Rouse; Yoram Sorokin; Ronald J Wapner; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 10.693

5.  Arabin cervical pessary for prevention of preterm birth in cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic LASER coagulation: the PECEP LASER randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Carlota Rodó; Sílvia Arévalo; Liesbeth Lewi; Isabel Couck; Bettina Hollwitz; Kurt Hecher; Elena Carreras
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.