Literature DB >> 14746837

Electromyographic biofeedback can improve subjective and objective measures of fecal incontinence in the short term.

Peter Beddy1, Paul Neary, Emmanuel I Eguare, Ruth McCollum, James Crosbie, Kevin C Conlon, Frank B V Keane.   

Abstract

Electromyographic biofeedback therapy has demonstrated subjective improvement in patients with fecal incontinence that is comparable to surgery. We assessed the efficacy of biofeedback therapy in a consecutive heterogeneous group of patients using both subjective and objective assessment criteria. These 28 patients with fecal incontinence were studied retrospectively. Patients were assessed using a quality-of-life questionnaire (QOL), the Vaizey and Wexner incontinence scoring systems, and anorectal manometry for efficacy of treatment, before and after biofeedback therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients completed the study. Median follow-up was 18 months. Eighty percent of patients demonstrated significant improvements in their Vaizey and Wexner scores (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The mean QOL score improved from 62 to 77 (P<0.01). Significant improvements were also demonstrated in the mean resting pressure (P<0.01), peak amplitude of squeeze (P<0.01), and the duration of squeeze pressure (P<0.05). The deferred 15-minute evacuation time also significantly increased (P<0.001). This study reported significant short-term improvement in fecal incontinence with electromyographic biofeedback therapy using validated subjective and objective scoring systems. Similarly, this treatment also significantly improved anorectal manometric findings. Our data confirm the role of biofeedback therapy in the multimodality approach to patients with fecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746837     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  Prospective trial of pelvic floor retraining in patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  N A Rieger; D A Wattchow; R G Sarre; S J Cooper; C A Rich; G T Saccone; A C Schloithe; J Toouli; J L McCall
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence.

Authors:  J Christiansen; O O Rasmussen; K Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  A J Malouf; C J Vaizey; R J Nicholls; M A Kamm
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; Cor Baeten; Randolph Bailey; Arne Bakka; Bruce Belin; Paul Belliveau; Eugen Berg; W Donald Buie; Marcus Burnstein; John Christiansen; John Coller; Susan Galandiuk; J Lange; Robert Madoff; Klaus E Matzel; Lars Påhlman; Rolland Parc; John Reilly; Massimo Seccia; Alan G Thorson; Anthony M Vernava
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution.

Authors:  Francis Michot; Bruno Costaglioli; Anne-Marie Leroi; Philippe Denis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Lafferty
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; M A Kamm; D M Gold; C I Bartram; S Halligan; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can the outcome of pelvic-floor rehabilitation in patients with fecal incontinence be predicted?

Authors:  M P Terra; M Deutekom; A C Dobben; C G M I Baeten; L W M Janssen; G E E Boeckxstaens; A F Engel; R J F Felt-Bersma; J F W Slors; M F Gerhards; A B Bijnen; E Everhardt; W R Schouten; B Berghmans; P M M Bossuyt; J Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.