Literature DB >> 14746588

Evaluation of contact versus non-contact diode laser cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucomas using similar energy settings.

Harish C Agarwal1, Viney Gupta, Ramanjit Sihota.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of contact and non-contact techniques of diode transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) in patients with refractory glaucoma in a prospective randomized manner.
METHODS: Sixty eyes with refractory glaucoma were randomly treated with either the contact or non-contact technique of diode TSCPC and followed up for a minimum of 12 months. A standard protocol of 1500 mW for 2 s per spot, with 40 spots over the entire 360 degrees circumference was followed for all eyes in both groups.
RESULTS: The reduction of mean baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) from 44.5 +/- 7.4 mmHg to 14.8 +/- 1.8 mmHg with the contact mode was not significantly different from that in the non-contact mode of 41.9 +/- 8.8 mmHg reduced to 14.5 +/- 1.5 mmHg (P = 0.34). The probability of IOP survival (<22 mmHg) at 1 year using the Kaplan-Meier plot was better using the contact mode, although the results did not achieve statistical significance. However, the average repeat treatments per eye with the non-contact mode (1.6 +/- 0.7) was significantly higher than with the contact method (1.2 +/- 0.6; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Using an energy setting of 3 J per spot, both the contact and non-contact methods of laser delivery were found to be equally effective in lowering IOP in eyes with refractory glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14746588     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2004.00754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  5 in total

1.  Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  Monica F Chen; Carole H Kim; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-10

Review 2.  Cyclodestructive procedures for non-refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  Manuele Michelessi; Amanda K Bicket; Kristina Lindsley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 3.  Evolution of Cyclophotocoagulation.

Authors:  Jideofor K Ndulue; Kamran Rahmatnejad; Carina Sanvicente; Sheryl S Wizov; Marlene R Moster
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Cyclodestructive Procedures in Glaucoma: A Review of Current and Emerging Options.

Authors:  Anna I Dastiridou; Andreas Katsanos; Philippe Denis; Brian A Francis; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Miguel A Teus; Anastasios-Georgios Konstas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Lasers in glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsh Kumar; Tarannum Mansoori; Gazella B Warjri; Bindu I Somarajan; Suman Bandil; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.