Literature DB >> 1474599

Sutural complexity in artificially deformed human (Homo sapiens) crania.

S C Anton1, C R Jaslow, S M Swartz.   

Abstract

The pattern of complexity of cranial sutures is highly variable both among and within species. Intentional cranial vault deformation in human populations provides a controlled natural experiment by which we were able to quantify aspects of sutural complexity and examine the relationship between sutural patterns and mechanical loading. Measures of sutural complexity (interdigitation, number, and size of sutural bones) were quantified from digitized tracings of 13 sutures and compared among three groups of crania (n = 70) from pre-European contact Peru. These groups represent sample populations deformed in 1) anteroposterior (AP) and 2) circumferential (C) directions and 3) an undeformed population. Intergroup comparisons show few differences in degree or asymmetry of sutural interdigitation. In the few comparisons which show differences, the C group is always more interdigitated than the other two while the AP group has more sutural bones. The sutures surrounding the temporal bone (sphenotemporal, occipitotemporal, and temporoparietal) most frequently show significant differences among groups. These differences are related to the more extreme binding of C type deformation and are consistent with hypothesized increases in tension at coronally oriented sutures in this group. The larger number of sutural bones in the AP group is consistent with the general broadening of the cranium in this group and with experimental evidence indicating the development of ossicles in areas of tension. We suggest that so few changes in sutural complexity occurred either because the magnitude of the growth vectors, unlike their direction, is not substantially altered or because mechanisms other than sutural growth modification are responsible for producing the altered vault shapes. In addition, the presence of fontanelles in the infant skulls during binding and the static nature of the binding may have contributed to the similarity in complexity among groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1474599     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052140307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical influences on suture development and patency.

Authors:  Susan W Herring
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2008

2.  A bidirectional interface growth model for cranial interosseous suture morphogenesis.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; John David Weissmann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Cranial sutures: a multidisciplinary review.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Emiliano Bruner; Jennilee Davidson; Patrizia Pisano; Thomas Haider; Scellig S Stone; Michael D Cusimano; Manfred Tschabitscher; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Craniofacial sutures: morphology, growth, and in vivo masticatory strains.

Authors:  K L Rafferty; S W Herring
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Changes in biomechanical strain and morphology of rat calvarial sutures and bone after Tgf-β3 inhibition of posterior interfrontal suture fusion.

Authors:  Reiko Shibazaki-Yorozuya; Qian Wang; Paul C Dechow; Koutaro Maki; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 6.  Cranial shape and size variation in human evolution: structural and functional perspectives.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Divided zygoma in Holocene human populations from Northern China.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Quanchao Zhang; Shiyu Yang; Paul C Dechow; Hong Zhu; Hui-Yuan Yeh; Qian Wang
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Wormian Bone of the Orbit: A Case Report.

Authors:  Asad Rizvi; Joe Iwanaga; Rod J Oskouian; Marios Loukas; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-07

9.  Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration.

Authors:  Thomas A Püschel; Martin Friess; Germán Manríquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A comparison of metrics for quantifying cranial suture complexity.

Authors:  Heather E White; Julien Clavel; Abigail S Tucker; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.118

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.