Literature DB >> 14745857

Locating and retaining research participants for follow-up studies.

Karen S Lyons1, Julie H Carter, Emily H Carter, Kirsten N Rush, Barbara J Stewart, Patricia G Archbold.   

Abstract

Two common pitfalls of longitudinal research are loss of participants over time and inability to locate participants whose contact information has changed. This article is based on our experiences in locating and retaining a sample of caregivers of persons with Parkinson's disease 8-10 years after we last contacted them. The strategies we used resulted in locating 86% of our sample and retaining 80% of those who were eligible. These strategies included asking participants for a backup contact, asking participants if they would be willing to be contacted again for a future study, making the most of existing search engines, keeping in touch, and being flexible, patient, and professional. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745857     DOI: 10.1002/nur.20001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  7 in total

1.  Thirty years later: Locating and interviewing participants of the Chicago Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Suh-Ruu Ou; Christina F Mondi; Sangok Yoo; Kyungin Park; Brianne Warren; Arthur J Reynolds
Journal:  Early Child Res Q       Date:  2019-09-26

2.  Maintaining participation and momentum in longitudinal research involving high-risk families.

Authors:  Ann L Graziotti; Jane Hammond; Daniel S Messinger; Carla M Bann; Cynthia Miller-Loncar; Jean E Twomey; Charlotte Bursi; Eunice Woldt; Jay Ann Nelson; Debra Fleischmann; Barbara Alexander
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.176

3.  Ten years later: Locating and interviewing children of drug abusers.

Authors:  Kevin P Haggerty; Charles B Fleming; Richard F Catalano; Renee S Petrie; Ronald J Rubin; Mary H Grassley
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2007-10-23

4.  Retention strategies in longitudinal studies with emerging adults.

Authors:  Kathleen M Hanna; Linda L Scott; Karen K Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.067

5.  Determinants of subject visit participation in a prospective cohort study of HTLV infection.

Authors:  Deborah A DeVita; Mary C White; Xin Zhao; Zhanna Kaidarova; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Re-recruiting young adult women into a second follow-up study.

Authors:  Yasmina Mohan; Melissa Cornejo; Margo Sidell; Jessica Smith; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-02-14

7.  Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children.

Authors:  Victoria MacBean; Simon B Drysdale; Sanja Zivanovic; Janet L Peacock; Anne Greenough
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.