Literature DB >> 14745574

An audit of neonatal colostomy for high anorectal malformation: the developing world perspective.

S K Chowdhary1, G Chalapathi, K L Narasimhan, R Samujh, J K Mahajan, P Menon, K L N Rao.   

Abstract

A high divided sigmoid colostomy has been recommended for staged management of high anorectal malformation. We audited our cases of neonatal colostomy for high anorectal malformation to assess its effectiveness. A retrospective study was carried out of all surgical newborns admitted with high imperforate anus as the single diagnosis at our centre between December 1998 and December 2000. Morbidity and mortality were analysed after retrospective stratification into two groups (group A: birth weight >2.5 kg; group B: birth weight <2.5 kg). The chi square test was used to test the statistical significance in terms of outcome in the two groups. Overall mortality was 16%. Group A consisted of 34 babies: 30 with divided sigmoid colostomy and four with transverse loop colostomy. One baby with a divided sigmoid colostomy died from wound complications and septicaemia (mortality 2.9%). All four babies with transverse loop colostomy done under local anaesthesia survived, despite being sick on arrival. Group B consisted of 16 babies: 15 with sigmoid colostomy and one with transverse loop colostomy, with seven deaths (44%). None of the five babies with transverse loop colostomy done under local anaesthesia died, despite being sick on arrival, whereas all eight babies who died had undergone sigmoid colostomy under general anaesthesia. The difference in the outcomes of babies in groups A and B is highly significant ( p <.01). Sick, small (<2.5 kg) and septic babies arriving late to the unit do not appear to tolerate general anaesthesia and divided sigmoid colostomy well, despite that procedure's long-term advantages. Divided sigmoid colostomy has produced excellent results in babies >2.5 kg, but in the context of the developing world and limited critical care availability, transverse loop colostomy under local anaesthesia may save lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745574     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-003-1100-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  3 in total

1.  Management of anorectal malformation in neonates.

Authors:  S K Chowdhary; A Gupta; R Samujh; K L Narasimhan; K L Rao
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  One hundred three consecutive patients with anorectal malformations and their associated anomalies.

Authors:  S Cho; S P Moore; T Fangman
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-05

3.  Colostomy complications in infants and children.

Authors:  S Nour; J Beck; M D Stringer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  3 in total
  8 in total

1.  Risk management in pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Girolamo Mattioli; Stefano Avanzini; Alessio Pini-Prato; Piero Buffa; Edoardo Guida; Giovanni Rapuzzi; Michele Torre; Valentina Rossi; Giovanni Montobbio; Ubaldo Rosati; Vincenzo Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Major neonatal surgery under local anesthesia: a cohort study from Bangladesh.

Authors:  L Hagander; M Kabir; Md Z Chowdhury; A Gunnarsdóttir; Md G Habib; T Banu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Promoting major pediatric surgical care in a low-income country: a 4-year experience in Eritrea.

Authors:  Alessandro Calisti; Kibreab Belay; Guglielmo Mazzoni; Guido Fiocca; Giuseppe Retrosi; Claudio Olivieri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Ostomy complicatıons in patients with anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Billur Demirogullari; Yavuz Yilmaz; Gulsen Ekingen Yildiz; I O Ozen; Ramazan Karabulut; Zafer Turkyilmaz; Kaan Sonmez; A Can Basaklar; Nuri Kale
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Colostomy for high anorectal malformation: an evaluation of morbidity and mortality in a developing country.

Authors:  Lohfa B Chirdan; Francis A Uba; Emmanuel A Ameh; Philip M Mshelbwala
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Trends in neonatal intestinal obstruction in a developing country, 1996-2005.

Authors:  S O Ekenze; S N Ibeziako; U O Ezomike
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Anorectal Malformations in Males: Pros and Cons of Neonatal versus Staged Reconstruction for High and Intermediate Varieties.

Authors:  Prema Menon; Katragadda Lakshmi Narasimha Rao; Amit Kumar Sinha; K Lokesha; Ram Samujh; Jai Kumar Mahajan; Ravi Prakash Kanojia; Monika Bawa
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  Outcome of loop versus divided colostomy in the management of anorectal malformations.

Authors:  Osama Ibrahim Almosallam; Ali Aseeri; Saud Al Shanafey
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.526

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.