Literature DB >> 14745393

Accuracy of EUS criteria and primary tumor site for identification of mediastinal lymph node metastasis from non-small-cell lung cancer.

Nathan Schmulewitz1, Stephan M Wildi, Shyam Varadarajulu, Stacey Roberts, Robert H Hawes, Brenda J Hoffman, Valerie Durkalski, Gerard A Silvestri, Mark I Block, Carolyn Reed, Michael B Wallace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EUS with FNA is useful for staging non-small-cell lung cancer. However, benign mediastinal adenopathy is common. The aims of this study were to identify clinical factors, especially primary tumor location, and EUS lymph nodal characteristics predictive of aortopulmonary window and subcarinal lymph node metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer.
METHODS: Patients with known or suspected non-small-cell lung cancer underwent EUS staging at which EUS-FNA was performed for all identified mediastinal lymph nodes. Clinical characteristics, primary tumor data, EUS findings, and histopathology were reviewed. Exact tests were performed for both aortopulmonary window and subcarinal lymph nodes to identify factors predictive of malignant cytology.
RESULTS: Ninety-two patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were included. Fifty-one had aortopulmonary window, and 73 had subcarinal lymph nodes on EUS. The EUS with FNA specimens were interpreted as suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy for 9 aortopulmonary window and 9 subcarinal lymph nodes. When comparing benign vs. malignant EUS with FNA findings for aortopulmonary window and subcarinal lymph nodes, only lymph node size of 1 cm or greater and sharp lymph nodal edges were associated with malignancy in lymph nodes at both sites, whereas primary tumor site, lymph node shape, and echogenicity were associated with malignant subcarinal nodes. When 4 classic lymph nodal features of malignancy were evaluated, the presence of 3 or more typical features had positive and negative predictive values of, respectively, 41% and 96%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although tumor location and EUS lymph nodal characteristics are associated with malignant involvement of lymph nodes, the accuracy of these predictors does not obviate the need for cytologic evaluation. EUS with FNA should be performed for all lymph nodes when an abnormal finding will alter management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745393     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02692-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  12 in total

1.  Using endobronchial ultrasound features to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Jessica S Wang Memoli; Ezzat El-Bayoumi; Nicholas J Pastis; Nichole T Tanner; Mario Gomez; J Terrill Huggins; Georgiana Onicescu; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Kent Armeson; Katherine K Taylor; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin-Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Presence of lymph node vasculature: a new EUS criterion for benign nodes?

Authors:  Joshua D Hall; Michel Kahaleh; Grace E White; Jayant Talreja; Patrick G Northup; Vanessa M Shami
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for suspected malignancies adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Pietro Gambitta; Antonio Armellino; Edoardo Forti; Maurizio Vertemati; Paola Enrica Colombo; Paolo Aseni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Interobserver agreement on the endosonographic features of lymph nodes in aerodigestive malignancies.

Authors:  Silvio W de Melo; Chakri Panjala; Sergio Crespo; Nancy N Diehl; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Endosonographic features predictive of malignancy in mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Kanwar R Gill; Marwan S Ghabril; Laith H Jamil; Muhammad K Hasan; Rebecca B McNeil; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo; Brenda J Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  In vivo characterization of pancreatic and lymph node tissue by using EUS spectrum analysis: a validation study.

Authors:  Ronald E Kumon; Michael J Pollack; Ashley L Faulx; Kayode Olowe; Farees T Farooq; Victor K Chen; Yun Zhou; Richard C K Wong; Gerard A Isenberg; Michael V Sivak; Amitabh Chak; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Predictors of malignancy in EUS-guided FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients without history of lung cancer.

Authors:  Leticia P Luz; Daniel M Moreira; Mahboob Khan; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.219

9.  Prognostic factors of resected node-positive lung cancer: location, extent of nodal metastases, and multimodal treatment.

Authors:  Alessandro Marra; Gunther Richardsen; Wolfgang Wagner; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Olaf M Koch; Ludger Hillejan
Journal:  Thorac Surg Sci       Date:  2011-12-27

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound: Elastographic lymph node evaluation.

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Christian Jenssen; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Xin-Wu Cui; Marc Giovannini; Michael Hocke; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Adrian Saftoiu; Siyu Sun; Liliana Chiorean
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.