Literature DB >> 14744840

Accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting celiac disease.

Mirella Fraquelli1, Agostino Colli, Alice Colucci, Maria Teresa Bardella, Cristina Trovato, Roberta Pometta, Michela Pagliarulo, Dario Conte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various ultrasonographic (US) signs have been reported in overt celiac disease (CD). The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 6 US parameters in predicting CD.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with chronic diarrhea (n=105), iron deficiency anemia (n=25), or dyspepsia (n=32) underwent anti-endomysial IgA antibody determination and duodenal biopsy. Moreover, US evaluation of 6 parameters (ie, fasting gallbladder volume, transverse diameter of small bowel loops, thickness of the small bowel wall, pattern of peristalsis, presence of free abdominal fluid, and diameter of the mesenteric lymph nodes) was done by 2 operators blind to the serological and histological findings. The pretest probability of CD was estimated to be between 5% and 10%. The percentage of agreement between US and histologic findings, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the posttest probability for positive and negative results were calculated.
RESULTS: Celiac disease was diagnosed in 12 patients (7.4%). An increased gallbladder volume, the presence of free fluid in the abdominal cavity, and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes showed a specificity of 96%, 96%, and 97%, respectively (95% confidence intervals [CIs], 92%-99%, 93%-99%, and 95%-99%), whereas the presence of dilated small bowel loops with increased fluid content and increased peristalsis had a sensitivity of 92% and 83%, respectively (95% CIs, 76%-100% and 62%-100%). Eleven (92%) of the 12 patients with celiac disease and 35 (23%) of the 150 patients who did not have the disease had at least 1 US sign (P=.001); all of the US signs were concomitantly present in 4 patients with CD (33%) and 1 patient without CD (0.6%) (P=.001).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic evaluation can accurately predict CD but its place in the diagnostic algorithm depends upon the probability of the disease in the considered population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14744840     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.2.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  11 in total

1.  A review of rifaximin and bacterial overgrowth in poorly responsive celiac disease.

Authors:  Matthew S Chang; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 2.  The role of ultrasonography in patients with celiac disease.

Authors:  Mirella Fraquelli; Valentina Sciola; Chiara Villa; Dario Conte
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Ultrasound capsule endoscopy: sounding out the future.

Authors:  Benjamin F Cox; Fraser Stewart; Holly Lay; Gerard Cummins; Ian P Newton; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Robert J C Steele; Inke Näthke; Sandy Cochran
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

Review 4.  The Liver and Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Alberto Rubio-Tapia; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.126

Review 5.  Advances in small bowel imaging.

Authors:  Christina A Tennyson; Carol E Semrad
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

6.  Sonography of the small bowel after oral administration of fluid: an assessment of the diagnostic value of the technique.

Authors:  P Mirk; R Foschi; L M Minordi; A Vecchioli Scaldazza; I De Vitis; L Guidi; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Sonography of the small intestine.

Authors:  Kim Nylund; Svein Ødegaard; Trygve Hausken; Geir Folvik; Gülen Arslan Lied; Ivan Viola; Helwig Hauser; Odd-Helge Gilja
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Liver involvement in celiac disease.

Authors:  A Rubio-Tapia; J A Murray
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Capsule enteroscopy versus small-bowel ultrasonography for the detection and differential diagnosis of intestinal diseases.

Authors:  Luca Elli; Erica Centorrino; Andrea Costantino; Maurizio Vecchi; Stefania Orlando; Mirella Fraquelli
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 10.  Transabdominal ultrasonography of the small bowel.

Authors:  Rudolf Kralik; Peter Trnovsky; Marcela Kopáčová
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.