Literature DB >> 14744789

Determination and modeling of kinetics of cancer cell killing by doxorubicin and doxorubicin encapsulated in targeted liposomes.

Rom E Eliaz1, Shlomo Nir, Cornelia Marty, Francis C Szoka.   

Abstract

Various mathematical approaches have been devised to relate the cytotoxic effect of drugs in cell culture to the drug concentration added to the cell culture medium. Such approaches can satisfactorily account for drug response when the drugs are free in solution, but the approach becomes problematic when the drug is delivered in a drug delivery system, such as a liposome. To address this problem, we have developed a simple model that assumes that the cytotoxic potency of a drug is a function of the intracellular drug level in a critical compartment. Upon exposure to drug, cell death commences after a lag time, and the cell kill rate is dependent on the amount of drug in the critical intracellular compartment. The computed number of cells in culture, at any time after exposure to the drug, takes into account the cell proliferation rate, the cell kill rate, the average intracellular drug concentration, and a lag time for cell killing. We have applied this model to compare the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin (DOX), or DOX encapsulated in a liposome that is targeted to CD44 on B16F10 melanoma cells in culture. CD44 is the surface receptor that binds to hyaluronan and is overexpressed on various cancer cells, including B16F10. We have shown previously that the drug encapsulated in hyaluronan-targeted liposomes was more potent than was the free drug. The model required the determination of the cell-associated DOX after the cells were incubated with various concentrations of the free or the encapsulated drug for 3 h, and the quantification of cell number at various times after exposure to the drug. The uptake of encapsulated drug was greater than that of the free drug, and the ratio of cell association of encapsulated:free drug was 1.3 at 0.5 micro g/ml and increased to 3.3 at 20 micro g/ml DOX. The results demonstrate that the enhanced potency of the encapsulated drug could stem from its enhanced uptake. However, in certain cases, where larger amounts of the free drug were added, such that the intracellular amounts of drug exceeded those obtained from the encapsulated drug, the numbers of viable cells were still significantly smaller for the encapsulated drug. This finding demonstrates that for given amounts of intracellular DOX, the encapsulated form was more efficient in killing B16F10 cells than the free drug. The outcome was expressed in the kinetic model as a 5-6-fold larger rate constant of cell killing potency for the encapsulated drug versus the free drug. The model provides a quantitative framework for comparing the cytotoxic effect in cultured cells when applying the drug in the free form or in a delivery system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14744789     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-0654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  37 in total

Review 1.  Hyaluronic acid-based nanocarriers for intracellular targeting: interfacial interactions with proteins in cancer.

Authors:  Ki Young Choi; Gurusamy Saravanakumar; Jae Hyung Park; Kinam Park
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.268

2.  Development of multifunctional hyaluronan-coated nanoparticles for imaging and drug delivery to cancer cells.

Authors:  Mohammad H El-Dakdouki; David C Zhu; Kheireddine El-Boubbou; Medha Kamat; Jianjun Chen; Wei Li; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  A new mathematical pharmacodynamic model of clonogenic cancer cell death by doxorubicin.

Authors:  Jan Lankelma; Rafael Fernández Luque; Henk Dekker; Jaap van den Berg; Bob Kooi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Cell cycle checkpoint models for cellular pharmacology of paclitaxel and platinum drugs.

Authors:  Ardith W El-Kareh; Rachel E Labes; Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Hyaluronan-CD44 interactions as potential targets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Suniti Misra; Paraskevi Heldin; Vincent C Hascall; Nikos K Karamanos; Spyros S Skandalis; Roger R Markwald; Shibnath Ghatak
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 5.542

6.  Ultrasound-guided intratumoral delivery of doxorubicin from in situ forming implants in a hepatocellular carcinoma model.

Authors:  Luis Solorio; Hanping Wu; Christopher Hernandez; Mihika Gangolli; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2016

7.  Accessing lipophilic ligands in dendrimer-based amphiphilic supramolecular assemblies for protein-induced disassembly.

Authors:  Volkan Yesilyurt; Rajasekharreddy Ramireddy; Malar A Azagarsamy; S Thayumanavan
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.236

8.  Development of drug loaded nanoparticles for tumor targeting. Part 1: Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation in 2D cell cultures.

Authors:  Mohammad H El-Dakdouki; Ellen Puré; Xuefei Huang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Cinnamon extract induces tumor cell death through inhibition of NFkappaB and AP1.

Authors:  Ho-Keun Kwon; Ji-Sun Hwang; Jae-Seon So; Choong-Gu Lee; Anupama Sahoo; Jae-Ha Ryu; Won Kyung Jeon; Byoung Seob Ko; Sung Haeng Lee; Zee Yong Park; Sin-Hyeog Im
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Hyaluronic acid derivative-based self-assembled nanoparticles for the treatment of melanoma.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Jin; Ubonvan Termsarasab; Seung-Hak Ko; Jae-Seong Shim; Saeho Chong; Suk-Jae Chung; Chang-Koo Shim; Hyun-Jong Cho; Dae-Duk Kim
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.