Literature DB >> 14744544

Pigeon's recognition of cartoons: effects of fragmentation, scrambling, and deletion of elements.

Atsuko Matsukawa1, Sana Inoue, Masako Jitsumori.   

Abstract

J. Cerella [Pattern Recognit. 12 (1980) 1] and more recently S. Watanabe [Behav. Proc. 53 (2001) 3] demonstrated that pigeons showed no decrement in recognizing cartoons that were spatially scrambled, indicating that pigeons' discriminative responding is controlled by local features alone. In contrast Kirkpatrick-Steger et al. [J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 24 (1998) 34] used line drawings as stimuli and demonstrated the importance of spatial organization for picture recognition by pigeons, confirming related findings reported in their previous studies. The present study revisited the recognition of cartoons by pigeons. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to discriminate cartoon people on a variety of background scenes. Subsequent tests revealed that discriminative performances with both familiar and novel instances decreased as the objects and object-like parts were progressively fragmented, indicating that search for the targeted cartoon people in the stimulus array might have enhanced the pigeons to attend to global aspects of cartoon people. Experiment 2 used line drawings of cartoon faces as stimuli and examined effects of scrambling and deletion of components. A set of components (eyes and eyebrows) exerted strong control over behavior and scrambling only moderately suppressed responding. The results suggest that pigeons use both global and local aspects, with different mixtures of these types of information depending on the particular perceptual context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14744544     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00147-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  7 in total

1.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Onur Güntürkün; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Alexis Garland; Roland Pusch
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Inferential Learning of Serial Order of Perceptual Categories by Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Natalie Tanner; Greg Jensen; Vincent P Ferrera; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Part-based and configural processing of owner's face in dogs.

Authors:  Elisa Pitteri; Paolo Mongillo; Paolo Carnier; Lieta Marinelli; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Are animals autistic savants.

Authors:  Giorgio Vallortigara; Allan Snyder; Gisela Kaplan; Patrick Bateson; Nicola S Clayton; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Perceptual category learning of photographic and painterly stimuli in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans.

Authors:  Drew Altschul; Greg Jensen; Herbert Terrace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.