Literature DB >> 14744529

Searching for cancer-associated gene polymorphisms: promises and obstacles.

Evgeny N Imyanitov1, Alexandr V Togo, Kaido P Hanson.   

Abstract

Low-penetrance genetic variations appear to form the most essential component of the heritability of cancer risk. Search for relevant polymorphic candidates faces significant obstacles, due to both the high number of potentially promising single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the intrinsic difficulties in identification of weak gene-disease interactions. At present, extensive case-control studies can be applied only to a limited number of gene polymorphisms. Therefore, the choice of SNPs that deserve an exhaustive populational analysis is of primary importance. Preferences are usually given to those genetic pathways, whose variability and role in cancer causation have been already shown by prior studies. The available electronic databases and software tools may allow further SNP sorting, based on functional predictions. The design for the pilot study may need to be different from the one for large-scale case-control analysis. Some investigations justify non-random patient selection for preliminary assessment of low-penetrance effects, with the emphasis on particularly susceptible individuals (familial, early onset, multiple cancer cases). Other presumably accelerating approaches suggest a decisive exclusion of SNP candidates showing only marginal effects, relaxed formats for rapid dissemination of preliminary data, use of more demonstrative controls such as elderly tumor-free subjects, etc. These short-cuts cannot be properly validated for the time being, due to the paucity of identified low-penetrance risk modifiers. It is expected that the increasing capacities of available DNA collections, coupled with the rapid development of high-throughput genotyping technologies, will vastly accelerate the research on polygenic cancer susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14744529     DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells: a novel paradigm for cancer prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Dharmalingam Subramaniam; Satish Ramalingam; Courtney W Houchen; Shrikant Anant
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.862

2.  Correlating observed odds ratios from lung cancer case-control studies to SNP functional scores predicted by bioinformatic tools.

Authors:  Yong Zhu; Aaron Hoffman; Xifeng Wu; Heping Zhang; Yawei Zhang; Derek Leaderer; Tongzhang Zheng
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Combined CYP1A1/GSTM1 at-risk genotypes are overrepresented in squamous cell lung carcinoma patients but underrepresented in elderly tumor-free subjects.

Authors:  Evgeniya V Belogubova; Yulia M Ulibina; Irina K Suvorova; Ekatherina Sh Kuligina; Maria B Karpova; Vladimir A Shutkin; Andrey V Koloskov; Alexandr P Kuchinskiy; Alexandr V Togo; Kaido P Hanson; Ari Hirvonen; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Association between MSH6 G39E polymorphism and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 7,046 cases and 34,554 controls.

Authors:  Zuming Li; Lihua Kong; Ling Yu; Jiao Huang; Ke Wang; Shi Chen; Miao Yu; Sheng Wei
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-13

5.  Two functional coding single nucleotide polymorphisms in STK15 (Aurora-A) coordinately increase esophageal cancer risk.

Authors:  Makoto T Kimura; Takahiro Mori; Jeffrey Conroy; Norma J Nowak; Susumu Satomi; Katsuyuki Tamai; Hiroki Nagase
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A Comparison of Logistic Regression, Logic Regression, Classification Tree, and Random Forests to Identify Effective Gene-Gene and Gene-Environmental Interactions.

Authors:  Wonsuk Yoo; Brian A Ference; Michele L Cote; Ann Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Appl Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08

7.  Managing Variant Interpretation Discrepancies in Hereditary Cancer: Clinical Practice, Concerns, and Desired Resources.

Authors:  Ellen Zirkelbach; Syed Hashmi; Aarti Ramdaney; Leslie Dunnington; Myla Ashfaq; Elizabeth K Nugent; Kate Wilson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Gene polymorphisms, apoptotic capacity and cancer risk.

Authors:  Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Gammaaminobutyric acid A receptor alpha 3 subunit is overexpressed in lung cancer.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Fengjie Guo; Miao Dai; Di Wang; Yongqing Tong; Jian Huang; Jinyue Hu; Guancheng Li
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Alteration of sister chromatid exchange frequencies in gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis patients with and without H. pylori infection.

Authors:  Ali Karaman; Doğan Nasir Binici; Mehmet Eşref Kabalar; Hakan Dursun; Ali Kurt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.