Literature DB >> 1474414

Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor.

B H Stricker1, J G Tijssen.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether the high number of reports of serum sickness to cefaclor was present in every country and year, and whether these figures from voluntary reporting facilitated an estimation of the relative risk. A nested case-control study was performed with reports of all suspected adverse reactions (ADR) to cefaclor, amoxicillin and cephalexin in the period 1968-1987, as reported to the WHO Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring from the U.S.A., the U.K., Sweden, Canada and Germany. The ADR-reporting odds ratio was defined as the ratio of the odds of the number of ADR-reports of serum sickness to cefaclor and amoxicillin or cephalexin and the odds of similar reports of non-serum sickness to cefaclor and amoxicillin or cephalexin. The ADR-reporting odds ratio adjusted for country, age, gender, origin of the report and year of marketing was 12.4 for cefaclor vs amoxicillin and 18.5 for cefaclor vs cephalexin. In children (< 15 years of age) and in adults (> 15 years of age), the relative risk of developing serum sickness of cefaclor vs amoxicillin was estimated at 13.9 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.0-32.2) and 2.9 (95% CI: 0.9-9.4) respectively in the U.S.A., and at 15.1 (95% CI: 7.2-31.5) and 5.5 (95% CI: 2.0-15.0) respectively in the other four countries together. In this study, the ADR-reporting odds ratio facilitated a valid estimation of the relative risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1474414     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90158-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  29 in total

1.  Signalling possible drug-drug interactions in a spontaneous reporting system: delay of withdrawal bleeding during concomitant use of oral contraceptives and itraconazole.

Authors:  E P Van Puijenbroek; A C Egberts; R H Meyboom; H G Leufkens
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance in perspective.

Authors:  R H Meyboom; A C Egberts; F W Gribnau; Y A Hekster
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Determinants of signal selection in a spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  E P van Puijenbroek; K van Grootheest; W L Diemont; H G Leufkens; A C Egberts
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Use of measures of disproportionality in pharmacovigilance: three Dutch examples.

Authors:  Antoine C G Egberts; Ronald H B Meyboom; Eugène P van Puijenbroek
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Application of quantitative signal detection in the Dutch spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Eugène van Puijenbroek; Willem Diemont; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Reactive metabolites and adverse drug reactions: clinical considerations.

Authors:  Sandra R Knowles; Lori E Shapiro; Neil H Shear
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 7.  Detection, verification, and quantification of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Bruno H Ch Stricker; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

8.  Association between concomitant use of several systemic NSAIDs and an excess risk of adverse drug reaction. A case/non-case study from the French Pharmacovigilance system database.

Authors:  François Clinard; Catherine Sgro; Marc Bardou; Patrick Hillon; Monique Dumas; Carmen Kreft-Jais; André Escousse; Claire Bonithon-Kopp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  A novel method for signal detection of adverse drug reactions based on proportional reporting ratios.

Authors:  Jian-Xiang Wei; Ming Li; Yue-Hong Sun; Ye Lu; Hou-Ming Xu
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-31

10.  Monitoring adverse events of the vaccination campaign against influenza A (H1N1) in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Eugène P van Puijenbroek; Nancy Broos; Kees van Grootheest
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.