Literature DB >> 1474411

The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests.

J A Knottnerus1, P Leffers.   

Abstract

The discrimination of a diagnostic test--characterized by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and ROC curve--may be influenced by referral patterns of general practitioners. Symptoms and test results in particular will affect the probability of referral, while the degree of development of the pathological process directly influences the probability of positive test results. Using numerical examples, we analyse and discuss a few specific situations: (1) referral depends only on symptoms; (2) referral depends both on symptoms and on test results; (3) referral depends only on test results. In the first situation, test characteristics and predictive values are invariant over the strata of symptomatology, while in the third situation the predictive values are unchanged. If there is a positive relationship between positive test results and referral probability, overall sensitivity will increase while specificity and likelihood ratio will decrease. A general representation is given for the evaluation of the direction of change of the likelihood ratio as a function of referral probabilities. The shape of receiver-operating characteristic curves is less sensitive to bias, but at the level of specific cut-off points considerable changes may occur.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1474411     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  29 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and general practice.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  J André Knottnerus; Chris van Weel; Jean W M Muris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-23

3.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.

Authors:  H C de Vet; T van der Weijden; J W Muris; J Heyrman; F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Operating characteristics of the negative expiratory pressure technique in predicting obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in snoring patients.

Authors:  A Van Meerhaeghe; P Delpire; P Stenuit; M Kerkhofs
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care: external validation of a clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Jörg Haasenritter; Stefan Bösner; Paul Vaucher; Lilli Herzig; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Erika Baum; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  The true treatment benefit is unpredictable in clinical trials using surrogate outcome measured with diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicza; Michel Cucherat; Francois Gueyffier; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  New approaches to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  P Moayyedi; J Duffy; B Delaney
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Contributions of symptoms, signs, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein to a diagnosis of pneumonia in acute lower respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  R M Hopstaken; J W Muris; J A Knottnerus; A D Kester; P E Rinkens; G J Dinant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Non-acute abdominal complaints in general practice: diagnostic value of signs and symptoms.

Authors:  J W Muris; R Starmans; G H Fijten; H F Crebolder; H J Schouten; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.