OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy to the head and neck often results in carotid stenosis, but the course of disease is unknown. We investigated the natural history and progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis induced by external irradiation. Patients and methods The study included 130 carotid arteries in 95 patients who had received external radiation therapy to the head and neck area and who had asymptomatic, mild internal carotid artery or common carotid artery stenosis. Stenosis of 15% to 49% on duplex ultrasound (US) scans defined mild (<50%) disease. Another 95 arteries in 74 patients with matched degree of carotid artery stenosis but who had not received radiation therapy were used as control. Both groups were followed up prospectively with serial duplex US scanning, and degree of carotid artery stenosis was categorized as 15% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%, and occlusion. Progression of carotid artery stenosis was defined as increase in stenosis from less than 50% to 50% or greater at ultrasonography. Secondary end points included progression to higher disease category, new cerebrovascular symptoms, and death. Data from irradiated arteries was compared with control data with the life table method. A Cox regression model was used to analyze disease progression, adjusted for covariates of sex, age, smoking, diabetes, and hypertension. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 36 months. Adjusted freedom from progression rates at 3 years were 65% for irradiated arteries and 87% for control arteries at life-table analysis (P =.035; odds ratio, 3.1). The annualized progression rate from less than 50% to 50% or greater in irradiated arteries was 15.4%, compared with 4.8% in nonirradiated arteries. A long history of cervical irradiation (>6 years) was the only significant risk factor for disease progression. There was no difference between the two groups regarding development of new symptoms or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenosis associated with external irradiation progresses more rapidly compared with nonirradiated atherosclerotic arteries. Aggressive surveillance is recommended.
OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy to the head and neck often results in carotid stenosis, but the course of disease is unknown. We investigated the natural history and progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis induced by external irradiation. Patients and methods The study included 130 carotid arteries in 95 patients who had received external radiation therapy to the head and neck area and who had asymptomatic, mild internal carotid artery or common carotid artery stenosis. Stenosis of 15% to 49% on duplex ultrasound (US) scans defined mild (<50%) disease. Another 95 arteries in 74 patients with matched degree of carotid artery stenosis but who had not received radiation therapy were used as control. Both groups were followed up prospectively with serial duplex US scanning, and degree of carotid artery stenosis was categorized as 15% to 49%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99%, and occlusion. Progression of carotid artery stenosis was defined as increase in stenosis from less than 50% to 50% or greater at ultrasonography. Secondary end points included progression to higher disease category, new cerebrovascular symptoms, and death. Data from irradiated arteries was compared with control data with the life table method. A Cox regression model was used to analyze disease progression, adjusted for covariates of sex, age, smoking, diabetes, and hypertension. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 36 months. Adjusted freedom from progression rates at 3 years were 65% for irradiated arteries and 87% for control arteries at life-table analysis (P =.035; odds ratio, 3.1). The annualized progression rate from less than 50% to 50% or greater in irradiated arteries was 15.4%, compared with 4.8% in nonirradiated arteries. A long history of cervical irradiation (>6 years) was the only significant risk factor for disease progression. There was no difference between the two groups regarding development of new symptoms or mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Carotid stenosis associated with external irradiation progresses more rapidly compared with nonirradiated atherosclerotic arteries. Aggressive surveillance is recommended.
Authors: Verónica Fernández-Alvarez; Fernando López; Carlos Suárez; Primoz Strojan; Avraham Eisbruch; Carl E Silver; William M Mendenhall; Johannes A Langendijk; Alessandra Rinaldo; Anne W M Lee; Jonathan J Beitler; Robert Smee; Javier Alvarez; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Maria Elena Gianicolo; Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo; Francesco Tramacere; Maria Grazia Andreassi; Maurizio Portaluri Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 2.062
Authors: Saske Hoving; Sylvia Heeneman; Marion J J Gijbels; Johannes A M te Poele; Manlio Bolla; Jeffrey F C Pol; Michelle Y Simons; Nicola S Russell; Mat J Daemen; Fiona A Stewart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathleen A Meeske; Stuart E Siegel; Vicente Gilsanz; Leslie Bernstein; Mary B Nelson; Richard Sposto; Fred A Weaver; Robert S Lavey; M P H Wendy J Mack; Marvin D Nelson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.167