Literature DB >> 14742790

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients.

Jennifer E Stark1, Wanda J Kilzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical patients is similar to that in moderate-risk surgery patients. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is recommended for certain medical patients, but its use in clinical practice is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether medically ill patients with established risk factors receive pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and determine whether prescribed regimens are consistent with current evidence and published recommendations.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 100 patients admitted to a hospital medicine service was conducted. Patients who were >40 years of age and admitted for congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or respiratory infection were considered appropriate candidates for VTE prophylaxis if they had no documented bleeding risk factors. Patients considered at increased risk of bleeding included those with documented uncontrolled hypertension, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, or recent gastrointestinal bleeding. Prescribed regimens were evaluated to determine whether they were consistent with regimens proven in clinical trials to be effective and safe.
RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the patients with established VTE risk factors and no documented risk factors for bleeding were prescribed pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An established regimen was prescribed in only 19% of those receiving prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant underutilization of VTE prophylaxis in this patient population. Patients are not adequately assessed for bleeding risk factors, and a portion of prescribed regimens are not those that have been established in the literature. Expert consensus statements recommend that hospitals develop strategies to prevent VTE events in their patients. Strategies to improve patient screening and physicians' prescribing habits are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14742790     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1D231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  9 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a prospective survey.

Authors:  Petra Jancar; Tina Morgan; Ales Mrhar; Mitja Kosnik; Mitja Lainscak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  A five-year, retrospective, comparison review of survival in neurosurgical patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism and treated with either inferior vena cava filters or anticoagulants.

Authors:  Amanda J Ghanim; Constantine Daskalakis; David J Eschelman; Walter K Kraft
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Patients admitted with acute abdominal conditions are at high risk for venous thromboembolism but often fail to receive adequate prophylaxis.

Authors:  Emily A Pearsall; Ujash Sheth; Darlene S Fenech; Margaret E McKenzie; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Underutilization of venous thromboemoblism prophylaxis in medical patients in a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Ramy Masroujeh; Wael Shamseddeen; Hussain Isma'eel; Zaher K Otrock; Ismail M Khalil; Ali Taher
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Improving adherence to venous thromoembolism prophylaxis using multiple interventions.

Authors:  Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq; Bassam M Saadeh
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.219

6.  Venous thromboembolism in medical inpatients--the silent epidemic of neglect.

Authors:  Kyle Perrin; Philip Robinson; Richard Beasley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 18.000

7.  Venous thromboprophylaxis in UK medical inpatients.

Authors:  S T Rashid; M R Thursz; N A Razvi; R Voller; T Orchard; S T Rashid; A A Shlebak
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Are hospitals delivering appropriate VTE prevention? The venous thromboembolism study to assess the rate of thromboprophylaxis (VTE start).

Authors:  A Amin; A C Spyropoulos; P Dobesh; A Shorr; M Hussein; E Mozaffari; J S Benner
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Inherited thrombophilia: key points for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Elizabeth Varga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.