Literature DB >> 14742768

Beta-blocker underuse in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.

Matthew J Everly1, Pamela C Heaton, Robert J Cluxton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical benefits of beta-blockers as secondary prevention following a myocardial infarction (MI) and to address the reasons that clinicians are reluctant to use beta-blockers in specific patient populations. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE was searched for articles published from January 1966 to October 2002. Relevant studies were identified by systematic searches of the literature for all reported studies of associations between beta-blocker underuse and secondary prevention of MI. Additional studies were identified by a hand search of references of original or review articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language human studies were selected and analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Associations were observed in studies of beta-blocker use as secondary prevention of MI. A lower rate of beta-blocker treatment occurred in older patients and in patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and peripheral arterial disease. In addition, underuse was attributed to the perception of high rates of adverse events associated with beta-blockers. beta-Blocker use as secondary prevention of an MI can lead to a 19-48% decrease in mortality and up to a 28% decrease in reinfarction rates. Nonetheless, beta-blockers are significantly underused in many patient populations due to concomitant disease states. Due to their normal physiologic deterioration, the elderly are at an increased risk of low cardiac output and bradycardia when given a beta-blocker; therefore, they should be started on a low dose that is then slowly titrated. In diabetic patients, beta-blockers can impair glucose control leading to hypoglycemia; therefore, post-MI diabetic patients must routinely monitor their blood glucose levels. In patients with decompensated heart failure, beta-blocker use can lead to further cardiac depression, but lower oral starting doses with slow titration can reduce this risk. beta-Blockers can induce bronchospasm in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, but cardioselective beta-blockers and appropriate use of medications such as albuterol can minimize these effects. Finally, in patients with peripheral arterial disease, with the exception of hypertensive patients with Reynaud's phenomenon, beta-blockers can be used safely. The only absolute contraindications to beta-blockers are severe bradycardia, preexisting sick sinus syndrome, second- and third-degree atrioventricular block, severe left ventricular dysfunction, active peripheral vascular disease with rest ischemia, or reactive airway disease so severe that airway support is required.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the cardiovascular benefits of beta-blockers as secondary prevention of MI significantly outweigh the risks associated with their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14742768     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1C472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  10 in total

1.  Long-term adherence to evidence based secondary prevention therapies after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ayse Akincigil; John R Bowblis; Carrie Levin; Saira Jan; Minalkumar Patel; Stephen Crystal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Arthroscopy for Knee Osteoarthritis Has Not Decreased After a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; Alexander H S Harris; Thomas R Bowe; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Prevention of cardiovascular events in elderly people.

Authors:  Wafik Farah Andrawes; Caroline Bussy; Joël Belmin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Initiation of β-blocker therapy and depression after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Anil M Ranchord; John A Spertus; Donna M Buchanan; Kensey L Gosch; Paul S Chan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  The effect of problem-based learning in patient education after an event of CORONARY heart disease--a randomised study in PRIMARY health care: design and methodology of the COR-PRIM study.

Authors:  Anita Kärner; Staffan Nilsson; Tiny Jaarsma; Agneta Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Peter Wodlin; Lisa Hjelmfors; Pia Tingström
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Effect of beta blocker use and type on hypoglycemia risk among hospitalized insulin requiring patients.

Authors:  Kathleen Dungan; Jennifer Merrill; Clarine Long; Philip Binkley
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.951

7.  The Effect of Nebivolol on Office Blood Pressure of Blacks Residing in Sub-Saharan Africa (A Pilot Study).

Authors:  Dike Ojji; Boni Maxime Ale; Lamkur Shedul; Ejiroghene Umuerri; Emmanuel Ejim; Chizindu Alikor; Charles Agunyenwa; Uche Njideofor; Helen Eze; Victor Ansa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-01-11

8.  Drugs potentially affecting the extent of airways reversibility on pulmonary function testing are frequently consumed despite guidelines.

Authors:  Terry E Jones; AnneMarie Southcott; Sean Homan
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2013-08-09

9.  Comparative effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination of losartan + HCTZ versus bisoprolol + HCTZ in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension: results of the 6-month ELIZA trial.

Authors:  G D Radchenko; Y M Sirenko; S M Kushnir; O O Torbas; A S Dobrokhod
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-09-27

10.  The efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol in hypertensive African American patients.

Authors:  Elijah Saunders; William B Smith; Karen B DeSalvo; Will A Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.