A K Thevos1, F A Kaona, M T Siajunza, R E Quick. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USA. thevosak@musc.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: In the developing world, drinking water is an important route for transmission of diarrheal disease, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. OBJECTIVES: In Field Trial 1 (FT1) and Field Trial 2 (FT2), the effectiveness of the behavior change approach known as motivational interviewing (MI) was compared to the standard practice of health education alone in initiating and sustaining safe water treatment and storage behavior among community residents. In Field Trial 3 (FT3), MI was compared with social marketing. DESIGN: Community surveys were conducted prior to local health promoter training and at follow-up. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Low socioeconomic status peri-urban communities in Zambia were project sites. Local volunteer health promoters from communities were trained in an adaptation of MI for safe water treatment and storage. INTERVENTIONS: All health promoters received instruction in the causes and prevention of diarrhea. Health promoters in the experimental (MI) groups received MI training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FT1 and FT3 measured detectable disinfectant levels in stored household water. FT2 measured disinfectant sales. FINDINGS: No significant differences between the treatment groups were found in FT1. Subsequent MI training incorporated lessons learned from the previous trial and resulted in much higher purchase rates of the disinfectant (FT2) and levels of disinfectant in stored household water (FT3) in the MI group. CONCLUSION: MI appears promising for public health initiatives in the developing world. Further research to improve and refine the method is needed.
CONTEXT: In the developing world, drinking water is an important route for transmission of diarrheal disease, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children. OBJECTIVES: In Field Trial 1 (FT1) and Field Trial 2 (FT2), the effectiveness of the behavior change approach known as motivational interviewing (MI) was compared to the standard practice of health education alone in initiating and sustaining safe water treatment and storage behavior among community residents. In Field Trial 3 (FT3), MI was compared with social marketing. DESIGN: Community surveys were conducted prior to local health promoter training and at follow-up. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Low socioeconomic status peri-urban communities in Zambia were project sites. Local volunteer health promoters from communities were trained in an adaptation of MI for safe water treatment and storage. INTERVENTIONS: All health promoters received instruction in the causes and prevention of diarrhea. Health promoters in the experimental (MI) groups received MI training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FT1 and FT3 measured detectable disinfectant levels in stored household water. FT2 measured disinfectant sales. FINDINGS: No significant differences between the treatment groups were found in FT1. Subsequent MI training incorporated lessons learned from the previous trial and resulted in much higher purchase rates of the disinfectant (FT2) and levels of disinfectant in stored household water (FT3) in the MI group. CONCLUSION: MI appears promising for public health initiatives in the developing world. Further research to improve and refine the method is needed.
Authors: Elizabeth Blanton; Sam Ombeki; Gordon Otieno Oluoch; Alex Mwaki; Kathleen Wannemuehler; Rob Quick Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: C E O'Reilly; M C Freeman; M Ravani; J Migele; A Mwaki; M Ayalo; S Ombeki; R M Hoekstra; R Quick Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2007-02-19 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Teralynn Ludwick; Alison Morgan; Sumit Kane; Margaret Kelaher; Barbara McPake Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Christine E Stauber; Bobbie Person; Ronald Otieno; Jared Oremo; Katharine Schilling; Matthew J Hayat; Tracy Ayers; Robert Quick Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Sarah D Bennett; Sara A Lowther; Felix Chingoli; Benson Chilima; Storn Kabuluzi; Tracy L Ayers; Thomas A Warne; Eric Mintz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-23 Impact factor: 3.240