Literature DB >> 14742019

Working with our communities: moving from service to scholarship in the health professions.

C A Maurana1, M Wolff, B J Beck, D E Simpson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: As faculty at health professionals schools have become increasingly engaged with their communities in partnerships to improve health, new questions have arisen about faculty rewards for such activities. To sustain the community work of their faculty, institutions need to reconceptualize faculty rewards, promotion, and tenure that are relevant to community activities. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: Scholarship has evolved since the 17th century from a focus on character-building to the practical needs of the nation to an emphasis on research. In 1990, Boyer proposed four interrelated dimensions of scholarship: (1) discovery; (2) integration;(3) application; and (4) teaching. The challenge became the development of criteria and innovative and creative ways to assess community scholarship. CURRENT MODELS FOR COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: This paper reviews four evidence-based models to document and evaluate scholarly activities that are applicable to community scholarship. PROPOSED MODEL FOR COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP: We propose a new model for community scholarship that focuses on both processes and outcomes, crosses the boundaries of teaching, research, and service, and reshapes and integrates them through community partnership. We hope this model will generate national discussion about community scholarship and provide thought-provoking information that will move the idea of community scholarship to its next stage of development.

Year:  2001        PMID: 14742019     DOI: 10.1080/13576280110064312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)        ISSN: 1357-6283


  6 in total

1.  Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding.

Authors:  Meredith Minkler; Angela Glover Blackwell; Mildred Thompson; Heather Tamir
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Faculty perceptions of how community-engaged research is valued in tenure, promotion, and retention decisions.

Authors:  Kathleen M Nokes; David A Nelson; Mary Anne McDonald; Karen Hacker; Jacquelyn Gosse; Becky Sanford; Shannon Opel
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Correlates of Health Communication Preferences in a Multiethnic Population of Pregnant Women and Mothers of Young Children.

Authors:  Katrina Daoud; Audra Gollenberg; Kim Fendley
Journal:  J Health Educ Res Dev       Date:  2016-03-09

4.  Key personnel and "long distance" settings: determining who must report financial conflict of interest.

Authors:  John Lynch; Christopher J Lindsell
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Community engagement and the ethics of global, translational research: a response to Sofaer and Eyal.

Authors:  John Lynch; Monica Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Valuing the scholarship of integration and the scholarship of application in the academy for health sciences scholars: recommended methods.

Authors:  Anne Hofmeyer; Mandi Newton; Cathie Scott
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2007-05-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.