Literature DB >> 14741905

Problem-based learning in online vs. face-to-face environments.

Jancis K Dennis1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study compared outcomes of problem-based learning between synchronous online groups and face-to-face tutorial groups. Specifically, the study compared learning outcomes, time-on-task and learning issue generation. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A post-test only control group design was used to investigate the effects of learning conditions on learning outcomes and processes. The experimental learning condition was defined as computer-mediated problem-based learning (CMPBL) and the control condition was traditional problem based learning in face-to-face groups (TPBL). The learning process consisted of four elements: an initial tutorial, a period of self-directed learning, a second tutorial and a laboratory session. During the initial tutorial students generated learning issues that they submitted to the research assistant. In the self-directed learning phase, students researched their learning issues and returned for the second tutorial with their findings. Students in the CMPBL groups interacted with the resource person electronically via email, chat room or bulletin board. At the second tutorial, groups shared information related to their learning issues and completed their products for the problem.
RESULTS: There was no difference in learning outcomes between groups. The CMPBL group spent significantly more time on learning than the TPBL group. There was no overall difference between groups on generation of learning issues; however, there was a significant relationship between number of learning issues generated and higher score on the examination regardless of tutorial medium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14741905     DOI: 10.1080/1357628031000116907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)        ISSN: 1357-6283


  5 in total

1.  Defining the effect and mediators of two knowledge translation strategies designed to alter knowledge, intent and clinical utilization of rehabilitation outcome measures: a study protocol [NCT00298727].

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Patty Solomon; Mary Law; Dianne Russell; Paul Stratford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Exploring Student Preconceptions of Readiness for Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Case Study.

Authors:  Peter Nicklen; Jennifer L Keating; Stephen Maloney
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  Student Response to Remote-Online Case-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Peter Nicklen; Jennifer L Keating; Stephen Maloney
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2016-03-22

4.  Digital Problem-Based Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Gerard Dunleavy; Neil A Smart; Monika Semwal; Jerome I Rotgans; Naomi Low-Beer; James Campbell
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Perceived positive social interdependence in online versus face-to-face team-based learning styles of collaborative learning: a randomized, controlled, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Ikuo Shimizu; Yasushi Matsuyama; Robbert Duvivier; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.263

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.