Literature DB >> 14741606

The effect of the processing and formulation parameters on the size of nanoparticles based on block copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) with and without hydrolytically sensitive groups.

D Neradovic1, O Soga, C F Van Nostrum, W E Hennink.   

Abstract

Block copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as a hydrophilic block and N-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAAm) or poly (NIPAAm-co-N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide-dilactate) (poly(NIPAAm-co-HPMAm-dilactate)) as a thermosensitive block, are able to self-assemble in water into nanoparticles above the cloud point (CP) of the thermosensitive block. The influence of processing and the formulation parameters on the size of the nanoparticles was studied using dynamic light scattering. PNIPAAm-b-PEG 2000 polymers were not suitable for the formation of small and stable particles. Block copolymers with PEG 5000 and 10000 formed relatively small and stable particles in aqueous solutions at temperatures above the CP of the thermosensitive block. Their size decreased with increasing molecular weight of the thermosensitive block, decreasing polymer concentration and using water instead of phosphate buffered saline as solvent. Extrusion and ultrasonication were inefficient methods to size down the polymeric nanoparticles. The heating rate of the polymer solutions was a dominant factor for the size of the nanoparticles. When an aqueous polymer solution was slowly heated through the CP, rather large particles (> or = 200 nm) were formed. Regardless the polymer composition, small nanoparticles (50-70 nm) with a narrow size distribution were formed, when a small volume of an aqueous polymer solution below the CP was added to a large volume of heated water. In this way the thermosensitive block copolymers rapidly pass their CP ('heat shock' procedure), resulting in small and stable nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14741606     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  9 in total

1.  An assessment of the effects of shell cross-linked nanoparticle size, core composition, and surface PEGylation on in vivo biodistribution.

Authors:  Xiankai Sun; Raffaella Rossin; Jeffrey L Turner; Matthew L Becker; Maisie J Joralemon; Michael J Welch; Karen L Wooley
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Degradation, cytotoxicity, and biocompatibility of NIPAAm-based thermosensitive, injectable, and bioresorbable polymer hydrogels.

Authors:  Zhanwu Cui; Bae Hoon Lee; Christine Pauken; Brent L Vernon
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Magnetic Heating of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Magnetic Micelles for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Amanda L Glover; James B Bennett; Jeremy S Pritchett; Sarah M Nikles; David E Nikles; Jacqueline A Nikles; Christopher S Brazel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Magn       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.700

4.  Fluorophore labeling of core-crosslinked polymeric micelles for multimodal in vivo and ex vivo optical imaging.

Authors:  Yang Shi; Sijumon Kunjachan; Zhuojun Wu; Felix Gremse; Diana Moeckel; Marc van Zandvoort; Fabian Kiessling; Gert Storm; Cornelus F van Nostrum; Wim E Hennink; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 5.  Physico-Chemical Strategies to Enhance Stability and Drug Retention of Polymeric Micelles for Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Yang Shi; Twan Lammers; Gert Storm; Wim E Hennink
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.979

6.  Self-Assembling Peptide Epitopes as Novel Platform for Anticancer Vaccination.

Authors:  Mazda Rad-Malekshahi; Marieke F Fransen; Małgorzata Krawczyk; Mercedeh Mansourian; Meriem Bourajjaj; Jian Chen; Ferry Ossendorp; Wim E Hennink; Enrico Mastrobattista; Maryam Amidi
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Nanoplatforms for Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Di Chang; Yuanyuan Ma; Xiaoxuan Xu; Jinbing Xie; Shenghong Ju
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 8.  Protein nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Warangkana Lohcharoenkal; Liying Wang; Yi Charlie Chen; Yon Rojanasakul
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  PEG-pHPMAm-based polymeric micelles loaded with doxorubicin-prodrugs in combination antitumor therapy with oncolytic vaccinia viruses.

Authors:  Eduardo Ruiz-Hernández; Michael Hess; Gustavo J Melen; Benjamin Theek; Marina Talelli; Yang Shi; Burcin Ozbakir; Erik A Teunissen; Manuel Ramírez; Diana Moeckel; Fabian Kiessling; Gert Storm; Hans W Scheeren; Wim E Hennink; Aladar A Szalay; Jochen Stritzker; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Polym Chem       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.582

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.