BACKGROUND: There are sufficient reports on the incidence of complications after endonasal surgery of the paranasal sinuses. It is the aim of this study to calculate the incidence of typical complications after primary and revision surgery, after "functional" and "extended" operations, together with the influence of expertise and of different optical devices on the complications rate. Preoperative computer tomography of the paranasal sinuses are the golden standard. There exists a historical interest to compare the complication rate in patients operated without and those with a CT, especially in those countries where the availability of CTs is low or not existent. METHODS: 266 consecutive patients who underwent an endonasal surgery of the paranasal sinuses from January 1989 to December 1990 were revised to study the incidence and relative risk rate of typical complications after primary and revision surgery, after "functional" or "extended" surgery, the rate for more experienced or less experienced surgeons, as well as the differences between endoscopic or microscopic surgery. The study also compares the complication rate of patients operated on with and without a preoperative computed tomography. RESULTS: 207 out of 263 patients (78.7 %) had no complication. 58 minor and three severe complication were registered for 56 patients. 6 patients had two or more minor complications. No surgeon showed a higher complication rate compared to others (p = 0.33), and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.279) in the complication rate between experienced and less experienced surgeons. Endoscopic or microscopic surgery showed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.117) and extended sinus surgery displayed more complications compared to minor surgery (p = 0.041), as well as primary surgery compared to revision surgery (p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences could be found for surgeries performed with or without computed tomography (p = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: A higher complication rate is to be expected for primary surgery and after extended sinus surgery, especially when an infundibulotomy was performed. In our series no learning curve was observed, especially as the variable "experience" showed no statistically significant difference. Endonasal surgery without CAT scan is not recommended, however, no higher complication rate was found in surgery without CAT scan.
BACKGROUND: There are sufficient reports on the incidence of complications after endonasal surgery of the paranasal sinuses. It is the aim of this study to calculate the incidence of typical complications after primary and revision surgery, after "functional" and "extended" operations, together with the influence of expertise and of different optical devices on the complications rate. Preoperative computer tomography of the paranasal sinuses are the golden standard. There exists a historical interest to compare the complication rate in patients operated without and those with a CT, especially in those countries where the availability of CTs is low or not existent. METHODS: 266 consecutive patients who underwent an endonasal surgery of the paranasal sinuses from January 1989 to December 1990 were revised to study the incidence and relative risk rate of typical complications after primary and revision surgery, after "functional" or "extended" surgery, the rate for more experienced or less experienced surgeons, as well as the differences between endoscopic or microscopic surgery. The study also compares the complication rate of patients operated on with and without a preoperative computed tomography. RESULTS: 207 out of 263 patients (78.7 %) had no complication. 58 minor and three severe complication were registered for 56 patients. 6 patients had two or more minor complications. No surgeon showed a higher complication rate compared to others (p = 0.33), and there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.279) in the complication rate between experienced and less experienced surgeons. Endoscopic or microscopic surgery showed no statistically significant differences (p = 0.117) and extended sinus surgery displayed more complications compared to minor surgery (p = 0.041), as well as primary surgery compared to revision surgery (p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences could be found for surgeries performed with or without computed tomography (p = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: A higher complication rate is to be expected for primary surgery and after extended sinus surgery, especially when an infundibulotomy was performed. In our series no learning curve was observed, especially as the variable "experience" showed no statistically significant difference. Endonasal surgery without CAT scan is not recommended, however, no higher complication rate was found in surgery without CAT scan.