W M Thomson1. 1. Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Otago, PO Box 647, Dunedin, New Zealand. mthomson@gandalf.otago.ac.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little was known of the natural history of dental caries among older adults until recently, but reports from a number of large cohort studies have now enabled better understanding of the nature and determinants of dental caries in older people. The aim of this review is to examine and compare findings from established population-based longitudinal studies of older adults in order to determine their preventive implications. METHODS: The dental literature was reviewed in order to identify reports on dental caries incidence from large, population-based dental longitudinal studies of older adults (age 50+) with at least 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Reports were identified from four studies (in Iowa, North Carolina, Ontario and South Australia) which met the criteria; four reports dealt with coronal caries, and five with root surface caries. When annualised, coronal and root surface caries increments were combined and compared with those reported for adolescents, the caries experience of older people over time (between 0.8 and 1.2 new surfaces affected per year) exceeded that reported from cohort studies of adolescents (between 0.4 and 1.2 surfaces per year). The only caries risk factor common to all four studies was the wearing of a partial denture (for root surface caries only). CONCLUSIONS: Older people are a caries-active group, experiencing new disease at a rate which is at least as great as that of adolescents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dentate older people should be the target of intensive monitoring and preventive efforts at both the clinical practice and public health levels. There is no easily identifiable 'magic bullet' for preventing caries in that age group, but the use of evidence-based preventive interventions (such as fluoride) should suffice.
BACKGROUND: Little was known of the natural history of dental caries among older adults until recently, but reports from a number of large cohort studies have now enabled better understanding of the nature and determinants of dental caries in older people. The aim of this review is to examine and compare findings from established population-based longitudinal studies of older adults in order to determine their preventive implications. METHODS: The dental literature was reviewed in order to identify reports on dental caries incidence from large, population-based dental longitudinal studies of older adults (age 50+) with at least 3 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Reports were identified from four studies (in Iowa, North Carolina, Ontario and South Australia) which met the criteria; four reports dealt with coronal caries, and five with root surface caries. When annualised, coronal and root surface caries increments were combined and compared with those reported for adolescents, the caries experience of older people over time (between 0.8 and 1.2 new surfaces affected per year) exceeded that reported from cohort studies of adolescents (between 0.4 and 1.2 surfaces per year). The only caries risk factor common to all four studies was the wearing of a partial denture (for root surface caries only). CONCLUSIONS: Older people are a caries-active group, experiencing new disease at a rate which is at least as great as that of adolescents. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dentate older people should be the target of intensive monitoring and preventive efforts at both the clinical practice and public health levels. There is no easily identifiable 'magic bullet' for preventing caries in that age group, but the use of evidence-based preventive interventions (such as fluoride) should suffice.
Authors: André V Ritter; John S Preisser; Yunro Chung; James D Bader; Daniel A Shugars; Bennett T Amaechi; Sonia K Makhija; Kimberly A Funkhouser; William M Vollmer Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2011-12-24 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Freida A Blostein; Erica C Jansen; Andrew D Jones; Teresa A Marshall; Betsy Foxman Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: James D Bader; Daniel A Shugars; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Gregg H Gilbert; Bennett T Amaechi; John P Brown Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Jennifer S Holtzman; Daniel Kohanchi; John Biren-Fetz; Margherita Fontana; Manisha Ramchandani; Kathryn Osann; Lucy Hallajian; Stephanie Mansour; Tasneem Nabelsi; Na Eun Chung; Petra Wilder-Smith Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 4.025